On Sat, Nov 15 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.14.1301 +0100]:
>> > In the long run, I really want to supersede "Closes:" anyway.
>> > Ideally, the bug gets marked 'fix-committed' when a signed-off
>> > commit closing the bug hits the repo (or a tag like
>> > closes-123456 appears), and an upload would identify bugs closed
>> > between the last upload and this one, using the repo and those
>> > commit IDs, and then selectively close those bugs.
>> Then why do you actually keep the changelog? Usually about 50% of
>> the times when I look at it is when I need to check "when was bug
>> X fixed?".
> The changelog
> (a) serves the data about which bug-closing-commits are actually
> part of the package that is being uploaded to the archive
> software, so that it can close the corresponding reports in the
> (b) provides the information needed to answer questions such as
> yours to the user from a file in the package itself without
> requiring the user to go online or know the VCS
> (c) selects only the relevant commits, e.g. it wouldn't contain
> a commit "fix typo in last commit".
I think you are missing the apt-listchanges audience (should I
upgrade to this version of the package?). Also, the user looking for
when a user visible change happened in /usr/share/doc/foo/. I looked
recently to see when po4a started taking --previous as an option, for
So the BTS and users are the consumers of the
changelog. developers are the consumers of the commit log.
Air pollution is really making us pay through the nose.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list