also sprach Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.14.1301 +0100]: > > In the long run, I really want to supersede "Closes:" anyway. > > Ideally, the bug gets marked 'fix-committed' when a signed-off > > commit closing the bug hits the repo (or a tag like > > closes-123456 appears), and an upload would identify bugs closed > > between the last upload and this one, using the repo and those > > commit IDs, and then selectively close those bugs. > > Then why do you actually keep the changelog? Usually about 50% of > the times when I look at it is when I need to check "when was bug > X fixed?".
The changelog (a) serves the data about which bug-closing-commits are actually part of the package that is being uploaded to the archive software, so that it can close the corresponding reports in the BTS (b) provides the information needed to answer questions such as yours to the user from a file in the package itself without requiring the user to go online or know the VCS (c) selects only the relevant commits, e.g. it wouldn't contain a commit "fix typo in last commit". -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "if java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution." -- robert sewell _______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list email@example.com http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss