On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:09:45AM -0500, James Westby wrote: > On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 08:39 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Guido Günther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.11.08.1419 +0100]: > > > Does this look like a worthwhile extension to the current changelog > > > format? For me it makes reviewing changes a lot easier. > > > > I think this is very important to have, but why put them at the > > front? Changelogs are for consumption by humans and machines, and > > humans have it easier if they can just start reading on the left > > side and get the information they want. Machines don't really care > > very much. > > > > So, similar to how we close bugs, how about > > > > * fixed segfault during daemon startup (Closes: #7005180) [fed3f3d] > > > > instead? > > You mean > > [fc5473a06be960382582ddbfb40e2a5f824be122] > > don't you? > > I don't think we need a VCS identifier there. I don't see why anyone > would specify a bzr revision id in a git package. > > How would this differ from using annotate on the changelog? Do some > people write the changelog at the end?
Yes. My changelog is generated from the commit log and is only present in the final integration branch. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/vcs-pkg-discuss