On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:41:51AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> I always try to say "modern" VCS, instead of distributed. The
> problem with SVN and all the other centralised VCS is not that they
> are centralised, but that they basically don't know what merges are.
> They pretend to merge, and SVN 1.5 even pretends to keep track of
> what it merges, but in the end it just stays brittle IME. YMMV of
> course. Lack of merging could get in the way, if we decided to make
> merges an integral part of the workflow.

Interesting point. Let's say we keep that field open until there is an
idea of implementation that would actually work. We can drop support for
VCSs and distros then if needed. ;-)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

vcs-pkg-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to