Take a look at the bottom of
-- it has been last updated on 2006-07-23. That's ancient history in the fast 
flowing Fedora world. In the last year or so I have never ever heard anybody 
mention other DVCS than git. Aside from bzr coming from THEM :-), there is such 
overwhelming majority of git users over anybody else, that nothing else than 
git is just not an option for distributed VCS.

There are periodically flamewars about switching our packaging to DVCS
(hell, I would be glad if we use at least CVS correctly), but usually
there are good reasons why it is rejected. See for example
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/68551/ and
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/56870/ or
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/48106/ for
examples of such flamewars. However, people are still working around
this (and yes, I know personally about many many people inside of Red
Hat who use git-cvsimport for their own packages) -- see


http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: ceplma<at>jabber.cz
GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC

As with the Christian religion, the worst advertisement for
Socialism is its adherents.
-- George Orwell

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy

vcs-pkg mailing list

Reply via email to