Take a look at the bottom of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/VersionControl/ArchitectureDraft -- it has been last updated on 2006-07-23. That's ancient history in the fast flowing Fedora world. In the last year or so I have never ever heard anybody mention other DVCS than git. Aside from bzr coming from THEM :-), there is such overwhelming majority of git users over anybody else, that nothing else than git is just not an option for distributed VCS.
There are periodically flamewars about switching our packaging to DVCS (hell, I would be glad if we use at least CVS correctly), but usually there are good reasons why it is rejected. See for example http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/68551/ and http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/56870/ or http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/48106/ for examples of such flamewars. However, people are still working around this (and yes, I know personally about many many people inside of Red Hat who use git-cvsimport for their own packages) -- see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/71048 Best, Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/blog/, Jabber: ceplma<at>jabber.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC As with the Christian religion, the worst advertisement for Socialism is its adherents. -- George Orwell
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
_______________________________________________ vcs-pkg mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.madduck.net/listinfo/vcs-pkg