On 12/02/10 11:55, Matti Lehtimäki wrote:
> 2010/12/1 Udo Richter <udo_rich...@gmx.de>:
>> Nice idea, however I see one small drawback: Until now, a 'pause'
>> instant recording lasts 3 hours (or whatever was set up). With your
>> patch, this time shortens to the time of the recording, which might be
>> rather short, for example if the timer actually records the previous
>> show and overlaps for a few minutes.
> I also thought about this problem and I now might have a solution which
> I'll try tonight. This would add a check if the time left in timer is longer
> than the margin at stop defined in setup and would start replaying only if
> this is true. Otherwise it would start a new instant recording as usual.
>> This, together with the fact that this is probably unexpected by the
>> user, can lead to disaster: If he's time-shifting later on, he'll be
>> quite surprised that the recording has stopped minutes ago and the
>> in-between show is gone.
> This is one reason why I added this as optional feature.
>> A probable solution would be to extend the ongoing recording to the
>> minimum time shift time, eg. Setup.InstantRecordTime.
> This is one possible solution and I will consider this also. This could be
> another way of solving the problem if time left in the timer is too short.
>> However, I have no problem with the fact that the same show is recorded
>> twice. This doesn't cause too much system load, and with today's disk
>> sizes, it really doesn't hurt.
> This is quite true, but it seems some people like the new feature and I
> would give it as an option.

At any rate, it's not going to be included in the original VDR source.
It complicates things without having a real advantage.
As Udo already noted, with today's huge disks it doesn't matter if
a show is recorded twice. The benefit of keeping things simple outweighs
this by far.


vdr mailing list

Reply via email to