On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote:
> Adding vdsm-devel, which is where such changes should be considered.
> It looks like in the future this may be a good choice, but we'll
> still need to support existing implementations, as well as colleague
> distro's who still do not have a proper systemd implementation.
> BTW, Gentoo is using ~29-r1 which is still unstable in portage tree.
> Any input from vdsm dev's on systemd scripts?

Recently, Federico suggested a systemd script for Vdsm

We may end up with a prolifiration of services (SysV for RHEL, systemd
for Fedora, upstart for Debian, and OpenRC for Gentoo) but that's Life,
I guess.
vdsm-devel mailing list

Reply via email to