On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Doron Fediuck wrote: > Adding vdsm-devel, which is where such changes should be considered. > > It looks like in the future this may be a good choice, but we'll > still need to support existing implementations, as well as colleague > distro's who still do not have a proper systemd implementation. > BTW, Gentoo is using ~29-r1 which is still unstable in portage tree. > > Any input from vdsm dev's on systemd scripts?
Recently, Federico suggested a systemd script for Vdsm http://gerrit.ovirt.org/263 We may end up with a prolifiration of services (SysV for RHEL, systemd for Fedora, upstart for Debian, and OpenRC for Gentoo) but that's Life, I guess. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
