----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alo...@redhat.com> > To: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimo...@redhat.com> > Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, "Itzik Brown" <itz...@mellanox.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 12:41:58 PM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] Problem building vdsm RPM > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Federico Simoncelli" <fsimo...@redhat.com> > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alo...@redhat.com> > > Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, "Itzik Brown" > > <itz...@mellanox.com> > > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 1:38:23 PM > > Subject: Re: [vdsm] Problem building vdsm RPM > > > > The problem with your rpmbuild command is that it's not automatic > > enough, > > if you want to automate it you use wildcards (vdsm*.gz) which will > > build > > any vdsm tar.gz you find in the directory rather the one you just > > prepared > > (which is what make rpm is doing). > > > > It's not that what you're saying is wrong (after all it's what > > autogen.sh > > and the Makefile rely upon, and it works for you), it's that what > > you > > do > > manually is already done automatically (with less potential errors > > and > > confusion for the newcomers). > > Well, my view is that there is a standard method of creating rpms out > of source tree.
That is why I pushed for autotools, so experienced people can use it in all the way they prefer. > Newcomers that have done this on one project can reuse their > knowledge to do this in another project. > > There is no need to create custom unique methods to confuse people. Are you suggesting that "./autogen.sh && make rpm" is "unique"? -- Federico _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
