Hey, Sorry for the delay, all morning I've been working to verify again the package and upload new version that fits the changes we did for vdsm-python-cpopen. We tried that until this package will be accepted to fedora, we'll make it as part of vdsm's rpms (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/13685/).
I ran rpmlint, koji build, and rpmbuild verification on the spec and source file, all looks fine. Please tell me if i need to run more tests before nudge you... (upload new spec and srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246) Thanks! And thanks Dan for pushing it forward.. ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ofer Schreiber" <[email protected]> > To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <[email protected]> > Cc: "VDSM Project Development" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 8:04:55 AM > Subject: Re: [vdsm] sync meeting minutes > > Sure, I can help. > I'll do it tomorrow when I'll arrive to the office. > (I haven't looked into the package itself, please make sure that it follows > all fedora guidelines, and that you have an official tarball published > somewhere, it will save some time) > > > ב-7 May 2013, בשעה 07:54, Dan Kenigsberg < [email protected] > כתב/ה: > > > > > On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 08:12:50PM -0400, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote: > > > VDSM sync meeting May 6th 13:30 UTC > > > > > > > > > Federico says that he can't see anything pending for 3.2. Tomorrow 3.2.2 will > > > be released. If anybody has anything pending push and ping Federico today. > > > > > > Storage is working on completing the feature pages, after that they will link > > > them in the oVirt release management page. > > > http://wiki.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management > > > Dan suggests to link the feature pages in their incomplete state to get more > > > feedback. > > > > > > Yaniv states features for oVirt-3.3 to be reported. Splitting supervdsm is > > > going to be one of them. Needs reviews. > > > > > > Yaniv discussed the libvirt connection getting wrapper. We are still looking > > > for a better solution that doesn't involve a special cif instance. > > > > > > Vinzenz hints Yaniv that for his cpopen that he needs to talk in fedora-devel > > > for the package to be reviewed there. > > Ofer, maybe you too can help us out with the review of > Bug 903246 - Review Request: cpopen - Creates a subprocess in > simpler safer manner > and its acceptence into Fedora? > > > > > > > Infra has been working on improving vdsm utils for out of process execution. > > > > > > The git master breakage from Mark Wu's patch was reverted and Giuseppe > > > Vallarelli has made a unit test for preventing future patches from breaking > > > master by importing vdsm/ modules from lib/vdsm. > > > > > > Vinzenz to ask on the list about the jsonrpc model. > > > > > > Libvirtvm.py and vm.py to be verified by Vinzenz and QE to be thoroughly > tested > > > this week. > > > > > > Vinzenz points out that vdsClient is completely out of sync with the schema. > > > Dan mentions that Zhou Zheng Sheng has probably had some success with that. > To > > > be presented in the Shangai workshop. > > > > > > Adam has automatically generated bindings that need review and should be > given > > > a push. Also vdsm schema verification has some work already done that should > be > > > resumed. > > > > > > We should put effort in bringing up possible changes/inconsistencies in the > > > schema relative to the way the api is evolving. > > > > > > Toni to copy the agenda of the workshop in the mailing list. (DONE) > > Thanks! > > _______________________________________________ > vdsm-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel > _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
