Hey,
Sorry for the delay,  all morning I've been working to verify again the package 
and upload new version that fits the changes we did for vdsm-python-cpopen.
We tried that until this package will be accepted to fedora, we'll make it as 
part of vdsm's rpms (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/13685/). 

I ran rpmlint, koji build, and rpmbuild verification on the spec and source 
file,  all looks fine. 
Please tell me if i need to run more tests before nudge you... (upload new spec 
and srpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903246)

Thanks!
And thanks Dan for pushing it forward..

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ofer Schreiber" <oschr...@redhat.com>
> To: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "VDSM Project Development" <vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2013 8:04:55 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] sync meeting minutes
> 
> Sure, I can help.
> I'll do it tomorrow when I'll arrive to the office.
> (I haven't looked into the package itself, please make sure that it follows
> all fedora guidelines, and that you have an official tarball published
> somewhere, it will save some time)
> 
> 
> ב-7 May 2013, בשעה 07:54, Dan Kenigsberg < dan...@redhat.com > כתב/ה:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 08:12:50PM -0400, Antoni Segura Puimedon wrote:
> 
> 
> VDSM sync meeting May 6th 13:30 UTC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Federico says that he can't see anything pending for 3.2. Tomorrow 3.2.2 will
> 
> 
> be released. If anybody has anything pending push and ping Federico today.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Storage is working on completing the feature pages, after that they will link
> 
> 
> them in the oVirt release management page.
> 
> 
> http://wiki.ovirt.org/OVirt_3.3_release-management
> 
> 
> Dan suggests to link the feature pages in their incomplete state to get more
> 
> 
> feedback.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yaniv states features for oVirt-3.3 to be reported. Splitting supervdsm is
> 
> 
> going to be one of them. Needs reviews.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yaniv discussed the libvirt connection getting wrapper. We are still looking
> 
> 
> for a better solution that doesn't involve a special cif instance.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Vinzenz hints Yaniv that for his cpopen that he needs to talk in fedora-devel
> 
> 
> for the package to be reviewed there.
> 
> Ofer, maybe you too can help us out with the review of
> Bug 903246 - Review Request: cpopen - Creates a subprocess in
> simpler safer manner
> and its acceptence into Fedora?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Infra has been working on improving vdsm utils for out of process execution.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The git master breakage from Mark Wu's patch was reverted and Giuseppe
> 
> 
> Vallarelli has made a unit test for preventing future patches from breaking
> 
> 
> master by importing vdsm/ modules from lib/vdsm.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Vinzenz to ask on the list about the jsonrpc model.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Libvirtvm.py and vm.py to be verified by Vinzenz and QE to be thoroughly
> tested
> 
> 
> this week.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Vinzenz points out that vdsClient is completely out of sync with the schema.
> 
> 
> Dan mentions that Zhou Zheng Sheng has probably had some success with that.
> To
> 
> 
> be presented in the Shangai workshop.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Adam has automatically generated bindings that need review and should be
> given
> 
> 
> a push. Also vdsm schema verification has some work already done that should
> be
> 
> 
> resumed.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> We should put effort in bringing up possible changes/inconsistencies in the
> 
> 
> schema relative to the way the api is evolving.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Toni to copy the agenda of the workshop in the mailing list. (DONE)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> vdsm-devel mailing list
> vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
>
_______________________________________________
vdsm-devel mailing list
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel

Reply via email to