> Given that the latest CVS of LogKit works with the version in Velocity (as
> Gump tells us that), I don't see what you had to do other than
> include a new .jar file.
It was not like that some weeks ago.
> I'm not presuming anything. I'm simply going with the facts you are giving
> me.
No you are not. You are presuming a lot. Like here (from a previous posting
you made on this thread):
> I doubt it, because so far, you haven't hinted that you even knew that you
> could do that.
>
> So, this is a null issue because you aren't even using the
> features you say you want to be able to use.
It would take to long and it would otherwise be a huge waste of energy to
"hint you" about everything I know.
However, when I do not "hint you" about some fact "A", that does not mean I
do not know about that same fact "A". Got it?
This is very simple logic. I am sure that a seasoned programmer like you
will understand.
Again, I am using those features.
Have fun,
Paulo
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:26 AM
> To: velocity-dev
> Subject: Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity
>
>
> on 7/31/01 5:47 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > You are presuming too much.
> >
> > I already have a version working with the new LogKit for some time.
> > But it was done in hurry and needs some extra care.
> >
> > Have fun,
> > Paulo
>
> Given that the latest CVS of LogKit works with the version in Velocity (as
> Gump tells us that), I don't see what you had to do other than
> include a new
> .jar file.
>
> I'm not presuming anything. I'm simply going with the facts you are giving
> me.
>
> -jon
>
