Those wrappers are minimal. With so many other places where you could save a lot of code, why are you so focused on this little bit that is even useful? Have fun, Paulo > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 2:06 AM > > > on 7/31/01 4:47 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Should we agree with you just because YOU are tired of LogKit? > > I'm just voicing my opinion. > > I never said that you have to agree with me. > > > Shouldn't Velocity be log system agnostic? > > It already is. I wrote the code. > > My suggestion is to take that out and just depend on Log4J. > > It will remove a few classes from Velocity itself, and make the code and > configuration smaller and simpler. > > -jon >
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jason van Zyl
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jason van Zyl
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
