Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity

[Jon Stevens]

on 8/1/01 3:20 AM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Unlike Jon's, this kind of objective argumentation makes a lot
> more sense to me and it sure raises my interest for log4j.

<repeat>I wasn't making an argument.</repeat>

<repeat>I was simply expressing an opinion.</repeat>

The fact that my opinion happens to be based on an enlightened opinion
because I listen to Jason on other lists definitely influenced my opinion.

Please attempt to understand that. I'm getting tired of repeating myself to
you.

> However, I still think that this and other libraries (e.g.:
> HttpClient) should be log-engine agnostic. Even when there is
> a standard API, they should use that API but still stay engine
> agnostic.

Ok, so if we make a dependency on Log4J today knowing that in the future,
Log4J will support the Java Logging API, what the heck is the difference?

-jon