on 7/31/01 4:47 PM, "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Should we agree with you just because YOU are tired of LogKit? I'm just voicing my opinion. I never said that you have to agree with me. > Shouldn't Velocity be log system agnostic? It already is. I wrote the code. My suggestion is to take that out and just depend on Log4J. It will remove a few classes from Velocity itself, and make the code and configuration smaller and simpler. -jon
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr .
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Geir Magnusson Jr.
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jason van Zyl
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jason van Zyl
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- RE: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Paulo Gaspar
- Re: [GUMP] Build Failure - Velocity Jon Stevens
