Tim said: ... > Would just like to know from Nathan/Gabriel that generally speaking this > bag of proposed stuff looks mostly ok.
apart from the naming issues, i think they're mostly ok. > I thought it would be easier for folks to eyeball the overall structure > with a built html version, rather than each person applying a dozen > separate patches just to get a quick look before saying, "no thanks". for documentation changes of this degree, i do appreciate this. ... > That said, do folks want me to start sending in each page's diff? probably not yet. the naming thing is still a hang-up IMHO. > Should they be attached to a bugzilla bug report? > What makes folks happy, one bug report or multiple? > (BTW I hate calling documentation changes bugs, because aside from the > true bug Nathan pointed out, the other stuff is largely subjective.) as far as i'm concerned, there can be bugs (typos or out-of-sync info) in documentation, but at this point, there is little documentation and velocity-tools doesn't really exist in bugzilla at this point, so i'm ok with posts to the dev-list. Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
