Tim said: ... > Speaking of size, which project do I send a patch to reduce the big > honkin' Jakarta logo to leave a little room for a project logo? <grin>
i'm pretty sure that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the place. also see: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jakarta-site2.html ... > Nathan wrote: > > i think it'd be nice to cut things down to just VelocityView > > and VelocityStruts (or whatever you want to call them). > > can anyone give a really good reason to maintain a separate > > library just for these tools? after all, they are "view tools." > Aren't the tools supposed to be able to live without > VelocityViewServlet, so folks using other frameworks can leverage them > without the extra baggage? yes, that's the idea. but as i said, one of the four tools in there (ParameterParser) is already dependent on the view package (the home of the VVS). so, if they want to compile the tools library or use the ParameterParser, they already need the view package. so what's the harm in combining the two? if they don't want to use the servlet-tied stuff, then they can just ignore it and use only the tools they want. Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
