> > 1) Move Struts tools into tools/struts > ?? they're already there. Sorry, yeah - all good there.
> :-) now argument has gone from theoretical to practical to > aesthetic... heh heh. Aren't all discussions aesthetic at some level? > but yes, doing at least this might ease my angst if i can't > win geir over on the combining proposal. Heck - I gotta say I'm on the fence. The arguments back and forth keep swaying me. It might be nice and clean if I wasn't building a webapp to have just the generic tools package like Geir says. But then, Nathan's right in that there are only 3 generic tools despite all the talk on the list. And the latest idea of combining the whole darn thing into one jar holds appeal too. Afterall, velocity-struts depends on both velocity-tools-struts and velocity-tools-view jar's to function anyway, eh? BTW - the combined weight of all three packages would be a paltry 42Kb. I'm hip to whatever solution gets us closer to a binary release so I can start heavily pimpin' VelocityStruts to anyone who'll listen. :-) Timo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
