On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 04:26 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:
Geir said: ......On Monday, March 3, 2003, at 04:39 PM, Nathan Bubna wrote:My (latest version of the) proposal was *not* to eliminate a generic
tools
package, but to merely fold the directory trees together. There
would
then
be a org.apache.velocity.tools.generic.* package to replace the
excised and
ill-named org.apache.velocity.tools.tools.* package.but... in terms of how we have the files organized in CVS, this would
involve moving pretty much all the source code around and reworking the
build.xml to have convenient "build just this part targets."
see, right now we not only build into three separate jars, but we also
have
three source code directory trees to match. this is a PITA IMHO.
instead
of having
view/src/java/org/blah/blah/blah/view
tools/src/java/org/blah/blah/blah/tools
struts/src/java/org/blah/blah/blah/struts
i would like to have just
src/java/org/blah/blah/blah/[view|tools|struts]
this is really not that radical of a concept. with the proper ant targets, no theoretical users will be horribly inconvenienced, and nathan's bizarre-perfectionist-neat-freak urges will be temporarily satiated. now, is that really worth a veto? :-)
As long as there is separation of the code, and the build target for the tool.jar doesn't require j2ee.jar to compile, I'm perfectly fine with it....
if you think about it, the 2nd of your prerequisites is dependent on the
first (for any sane implementation)... both these have been promised and
will be done.
so, i'll take this as the end of opposition (at least from committers) and
get to work on it.
Yep
-- Geir Magnusson Jr 203-956-2604(w) Adeptra, Inc. 203-434-2093(m) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 203-247-1713(m)
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
