Monday, March 3, 2003, 1:02:25 PM, Terry Steichen wrote: > I too use Velocity and find it quite stable. I've also extended it (as have > most) with specialized tools, and as a result, it does precisely what I want > it to do. I agree that it's important to take a look at the bug processing > and make sure it is robust. But I don't understand your comment about > losing ground in comparision to other engines. What does that mean in terms > of being able to do things with other alternatives that you can't do with > Velocity? [snip]
Well, with this approach we would still use assembly, because you can do everything with it... :) So C is needles, and it is more complicated anyway, so it is simply bad. :) -- Best regards, Daniel Dekany --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
