Thanks for the kind and highly useful thoughts. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Dekany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Velocity Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 11:43 AM Subject: Re: AW: velocity 1.3.1 final?
> Monday, March 3, 2003, 1:02:25 PM, Terry Steichen wrote: > > > I too use Velocity and find it quite stable. I've also extended it (as have > > most) with specialized tools, and as a result, it does precisely what I want > > it to do. I agree that it's important to take a look at the bug processing > > and make sure it is robust. But I don't understand your comment about > > losing ground in comparision to other engines. What does that mean in terms > > of being able to do things with other alternatives that you can't do with > > Velocity? > [snip] > > Well, with this approach we would still use assembly, because you can do > everything with it... :) So C is needles, and it is more complicated > anyway, so it is simply bad. :) > > -- > Best regards, > Daniel Dekany > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
