Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
A colleague noticed that while there's a 0.45 jar of velocity-dvsl in
the Maven repository; there are no tags in SVN and there's been no
release on the site. I took a quick look and he's right; it's not a
cvs2svn issue as there were no tags in CVS either.
Is the 0.45 jar an unofficial rogue one?
I wouldn't call it "rogue" :)
I'm surprised that there weren't any version tags, as I am usually very
good about that...
Do you want to see a release?
This whole discussion strikes me as odd. To me, the reasons for a new
release are that you have new features and/or bugfixes that you want to
get out there. Why on earth would you put out a new release of something
that has not been actively developed for at least 3 years, and, of which
nobody really has taken ownership, something that is basically abandonware?
In whose interest is it to encourage people to use code that is not
being actively maintained or supported? That is what you would be doing
by putting out some kind of official release of DVSL.
Jonathan Revusky
--
lead developer, FreeMarker project, http://freemarker.org/
geir
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
