"Max Rydahl Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 01:39:15 +0100, Will Glass-Husain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>> Sure, why not?
>because then users who like to know if a subsystem is configured
>before using it will not get a warning/exception.
>I would rather say that all the static singleton functionallity
>should be ripped out of velocity since it is a Bad Thing.
Yes. But let's keep this for VelToo, which is my internal code name
for Velocity 2.0 (you don't want to catch me calling it "V2"
ever... :-| ). I'll try to keep focused on getting 1.5 out of the door.
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
Social behaviour: Bavarians can be extremely egalitarian and folksy.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bavaria
Most Franconians do not like to be called Bavarians.
-- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franconia
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
