TEETH
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Cotner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: Fly rod holder [was Re: [VFB] OK, Now for an "Etics" Question]


> I'm getting ready to go fish in Canada for a week.  Rather than canoes,
Jimi,
> we use sea kayaks.  We can't always drift to troll and need something to
hold
> the rod while we paddle.  Is anyone aware of a rod holder that
accommodates a
> fly rod?
> And no, I certainly see nothing unethical, unsportsmanlike or ungamely
about
> trolling for fish with a fly.  I think that's probably how most sailfish
are
> caught on a fly.
> Regards,
> Roger Cotner
> Grand Haven, Michigan
>
> Desert Eagle wrote:
> >
> > Hope this will generate answers and not to many rocks.
> >
> >     I have been studying the techniques used by Walleye fisherman up
north.
> > It appears that one of the most productive and often used methods of
> > locating them is by trolling. I am have some pretty good luck by using a
> > sinking line and long leader to get the weighted flies down, but keeping
> > them at depth on the retrieve is almost impossible.
> >     Now for the question. In using the canoe I can and often have used a
sea
> > anchor to maintain a slow drift with wind or current. It is not much
trouble
> > using a sinking fly line with a long leader and weighted fly to be able
to
> > get them down deep. But I guess my question is, rather than using a
striping
> > retrieve and then casting back out and waiting for it to sink again, is
> > gently "Trolling" a fly at depth, on a fly rod, with a fly line and
leader,
> > still considered "Fly Fishing" ?? It appears that this may be a very
> > productive way to not only locate the Walleye, but be able to keep the
fly
> > in the "Fish" zone longer. When they are located, if on structure or
> > schooled, then I can anchor and cast to them and work them normal fly
> > fishing fashion. Would this be considered "Ethical" fly fishing ??
> >
> > Input will be appreciated, stones will be dodged.
> > Jimi
>

Reply via email to