RE: [videoblogging] Embed vs. Pop-Up

Mon, 17 Apr 2006 05:25:54 -0700

Hi Jeff,
 
Many folks have pop-ups disabled on their browsers, therefore I prefer embedded. Also, I think that embedded videos look more professional and do a better job of maintaining 'brand awareness'.
 
Cheers
Monique Danielle
http://www.vlogchallenge.com - This Week's Challenge Extended: Resurrection
http://www.vlogdiva.com - This Weeks Video: Networking Tips

Cheers
Monique
_________________________________________
Monique Danielle, President
Referrals comprise the majority of our business. Please tell others about us.

DivaDesignWorld
Oregon PH: 971.285.3118
Florida PH: 239.963.1243
Fax: 206.309.0088
www.divadesignworld.com
www.divadirectories.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Marquis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 11:58 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Embed vs. Pop-Up

Forgive my ignorance, as I'm sure many of you understand this better than I.

Verdi mentioned today his dislike of embedded quicktime movies, and the issue of scrolling. Is the issue simply that viewing videos via a pop-up is optimal to the embedded approach, so that you can move the pop-up window around on the desktop to where you like?  I hope this doesn't sound like too stupid of a question, but I want to make sure that I'm not missing something here.

I have switched over from Josh's pop-up solution (embedthevideo.com), to Enric's vPIP.  I can scroll OK, in Firefox and IE, while a vid is playing - although that isn't something I personally do that much.

I would like to do what works best for my viewers (all 10 of them :)), and would like  to hear more opinions on what the group thinks is the optimal approach.

Also, I would like to thank this discussion group for the fantastic support and guidance provided. I really enjoy monitoring the discussions, and appreciate the community spirit.

Jeff Marquis
Tidbit Vids 


--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Verdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah - I understand that Bill. For me the problem is even one embed
> quicktime movie is enough to make scrolling on a blog suck big time.
>
> On 4/16/06, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Actually the way Vpip works is that it doesn't actually embed the
> > movie untill the thumbnail is clicked. Then it dynamically embeds the
> > movie in the jpgs place (works with WMV SWF MP4 and QT) and if another
> > movie is activated the script unembeds any other movies on the page.
> > So it would be imposible to have more than one embeded movie on the
> > page at a time. It's actually a really nice solution.
> >
> > Bill Streeter
> > LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
> > www.lofistl.com
> >
> >
> > --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Verdi" michael@ wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/16/06, Ryan Ozawa ryanozawa@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > > so I was wondering why they're so popular among vloggers.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > The answer to that question for me is: Even an elegant solution like
> > Enric's
> > > vPIP results in a video embeded in your vlog. Scrolling the page,
> > even with
> > > just one embeded Quicktime movie, sucks. To me it's a really crappy user
> > > experience. It really only works well on a page like Rocketboom's that's
> > > designed to not scroll. If instead the video appears in a pop-up
> > window you
> > > now avoid the scrolling problem, plus the viewer can place the video
> > where
> > > ever they want on the screen.
> > > -Verdi
> > >
> > > --
> > > Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> > > R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> > > Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> > > Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Me: http://michaelverdi.com
> R&D: http://evilvlog.com
> Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
> Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org
>
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



Reply via email to