--- In [email protected], "Charles Iliya Krempeaux"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Ron,
>
> <snip>
>
> No, that is not what I'm trying to say.
>
> What I'm trying to say is that we can have regulation and a tier-free
> Internet... but that I think government regulation (as we've been
talking
> about) is morally wrong.
>
> I do NOT believe that the only other choice is to give the
communications
> cartels what they want.  I think that there are other things that we
can do
> to stop a Tiered Internet besides regulation.
>
> (I gave some suggestions before, but...) I was hoping this conversation
> would lead to a discussion of what those other things could be.  (This
> conversation doesn't seem to be going in that direction though.)
>

I haven't followed the conversation closely.  But this is a subject of
interest:  How can the barrier to entry for the worldwide network
(current and future such as Internet2) be kept low and regulation be
minimal or not in place? 

  -- Enric

>
>
> <snip>
>
> --
>     Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
>
>     charles @ reptile.ca
>     supercanadian @ gmail.com
>
>     developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
>
___________________________________________________________________________
>  Make Television                              
http://maketelevision.com/
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Fireant Individual Typepad
Use Explains


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to