Legal loophole: can a work have two licenses simultaneously? Andreas Haugstrup wrote: What part of "If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you *may* distribute the resulting work *only* under a license identical to this one" is unclear to you (emphasis mine)?And from the legal code: "You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Japan)." It is quite clear. If you use materiale from a Share-Alike work (apart from Fair Use), you *must* release your work under the exact same license. I've been telling you it's stupid, but that's how it is. - Andreas
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Enric
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radic... Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright ... Andreas Haugstrup
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyri... Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Co... Andreas Haugstrup
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Co... Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Co... Michael Verdi