Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
Normally, yes, but not in this care. The license says: "You may distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly digitally perform a Derivative Work only under the terms of this License, a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License, or a Creative Commons iCommons license that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g. Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 Japan)." It must contain the same elements. It doesn't prohibit it from containing a few more as well!
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- Re: [videoblogging] Copyright radical Michael Verdi
- Re: [videoblogging] Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Enric
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Enric
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Enric
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Enric
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Andreas Haugstrup
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Charles HOPE
- Re: [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Michael Verdi
- [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical wtrainbow
- [videoblogging] Re: Copyright radical Enric
