Ahh theres a big problem with number 4. It defeats a large chunks of the rights you are giving with any of the creative commons licenses.
To the best of my knowledge the CC licences give people the right to "copy, distribute, display, and perform your work " providing they stick to the other rules such as non-commercial. Therefore if anybody is currently putting out videos with creative commons licences, there is nothing you can legally do to stop a non-commercial entity such as myself from rehosting & redistributing your videos, providing I stick to all the other rules of the license you have selected. After all, without granting the rights to at a minimum copy, distribute, display and perform, then its pretty much a normal copyright that you want to use. Pegarding point 7, if you want to insist on permalinks then I believe thats probably compatible with creative commons, do it as part of the license where its up to you to declare how you want to be attributed. So lets talk some more about these things, we cant use creative commons as a starting point and then remove some more rights from it, can only use it as a platform to give away more rights! If people really dont want their stuff to be redistributed even non-commercially, then creative commons is not for you! Cheers Steve Elbows --- In [email protected], "Mike Meiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 4) no transcoding or rehosting the video without permission > 7) "sharing" features such as "email this", "post to your blog", and > others... must follow the share-a-like principal. In other words they > MUST at a minimum contain a direct link to the original post > (permalink)... and the original video. No bouncing or redirecting or > obscuring of these urls for tracking purposes.
