Hi,

Why did apple only put in 2 megapixels in the iphone's camera?

Rodli




--- In [email protected], "Mike Meiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 1/9/07, David King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You said "Why should it be teathered to one desktop computer with a
> > sync cable."
> >
> > That one's easy - it's so Apple can sell TWO things... :-)
> >
> > David
> 
> 
> 
> Precicely, Apple's "digital hub" strategy. :)
> 
> But if they don't cut the umbilical cord, someone else is going to because
> at this point their sacrificing a tremendous amount of obvious functionality
> and value to keep the iPhone and iPod tethered.
> 
> I'm telling you, mobile video blogging  and video sharing is coming... both
> sides of the coing the consumptive side and production side.
> 
> -Mike
> mmeiser.com/blog
> mefeedia.com
> 
> On 1/9/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >   Ha, I'm here.
> > >
> > > I just have so much to say I don't even know where to begin.
> > >
> > > Mostly I'm excited because this is a HUGE leap forward for not just
> > > the mobile web... the extension of network neutrality principles to
> > > the mobile web.
> > >
> > > But also because it illustrates apple REALLY, REALLY get's mobile
> > > computing.
> > >
> > > Specifically mobile computing is ALL about communications.
> > >
> > > This device is heavily hevily focused on personal / inter-personal
> > > communications.
> > >
> > > voice, IM, SMS, picture sharing and so much more
> > >
> > > it also supports audio and video podcasting but apple hasn't yet cut
> > > the sync cable.
> > >
> > > This is to say... it makes no sense... that you should be walking
> > > around or sitting at your desk at work with this marelous piece of
> > > tech with wifi and GSM in your pocket or sitting on your desktop with
> > > the same old podcasts and videos from when you left home in the
> > > morning. Why should it be teathered to one desktop computer with a
> > > sync cable.
> > >
> > > Why should such a marvelous piece of tech NOT aggregate your latest
> > > audio or video podcasts directly from the web so that anytime you pick
> > > it up it has "new stuff".
> > >
> > > And for that matter why when you buy anything from the itunes store
> > > why should it not be automatically delivered to the device.
> > >
> > > Why should you have to carry it home each night to sync it? And what
> > > if you go out of town for a few days... why should you not have access
> > > to your latest podcasts, videos and media wherever you are?
> > >
> > > These are the same questions people have asked of email and I expect
> > > they will come to the same conclusions... building both webservices
> > > for audio and video podcast management... and building support onto
> > > hardware devices much like the blackberry.
> > >
> > > In fact, I dare say, that much like mobile email. Mobile podcast
> > > aggregation will one day be a killer app on the mobile computing
> > > platform.
> > >
> > > At this point... do to the questions the new iPhone asks... though the
> > > answers have not yet been given.... this vision that media should flow
> > > directly from the web to your device is pretty much inevitable. It is
> > > inevitable because it is where the questions lead, and have been
> > > leading since Microsoft put wifi in the Zune, though they did nothing
> > > with it. Indeed, the editors of the Chicago suntimes, the Wall Street
> > > Journal, and the NYTimes even asked such questions. Why should I have
> > > to sync the such a device when it has wifi built in? The answer is
> > > you shouldn't. The answer is... there's no reason why you such a
> > > device should ever be teathered to a single desktop computer again.
> > >
> > > That said, direct to device aggregation of podcasts and purchases
> > > probably wasn't an extremely high priority with apple given the
> > > tremendous amount of features in this new iPhone device... but I
> > > suspect that one way or another aggregation will be coming to this
> > > device soon. Especially since it appears to be running some basic
> > > version of Mac OSX. I would hope in fact that Fireant or Democracy
> > > will be ported to it soon. I think i'll be a SUPERB platform for
> > > Democracy in particular. The Democracy interface was made to run on
> > > the iPhone over wifi.
> > >
> > > One last thing... people keep bitching about cellular data and
> > > aggregation. They keep saying... cellular networks aren't fast
> > > enough... even if they were they'd never allow it... Well screw the
> > > cellular networks... if they're not fast enough or too closed who
> > > cares. Podcasting and videoblogging does NOT require always on
> > > connectivity... all it requires is that when you go to pick up your
> > > iphone there's something new.
> > >
> > > One final thing. One reason I'm so obsessed with bringing audio and
> > > video podcasting to the mobile web is because moving them beyond the
> > > desktop will not only enhance the power and ubiquity of open access
> > > media... think digital divide... think one laptop per child.... think
> > > limited portable computing droping in price and becoming ubiquitous
> > > all aroudn the world... but also they will enhance video
> > > podcasting, video sharing, and audio podcasting's value as means of
> > > inter-personal communications in much the same way the blackberry and
> > > so called "mobile email" enhances the communications value of email.
> > >
> > > Ubiquity, ease of use, and in the future a constant drop in the price
> > > of hardware and connectivity are the key.
> > >
> > > Oh, and speaking of connectivity, apple talked about a new focus on
> > > wimax with some partnership. If wimax ever pans out we'll be talking
> > > about a ubiquitous broadband network that's easier and cheaper to
> > > install and maintain than todays cellular networks... which is pretty
> > > interestng because cellular networks have already penetrated some of
> > > the farthest corners of the planet.
> > >
> > > It all ads up to a completely new and very distruptive communications
> > > paradigm.
> > >
> > > Peace,
> > >
> > > -Mike
> > > mmeiser.com/blog
> > > mefeedia.com
> > > intermediated.com
> > > evilvlog.com
> > >
> > > On 1/9/07, Nathan Freitas <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <nathan%40cruxy.com>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > sull wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > do you think osx is open to users or confined to approved
> > > applications?
> > > > >
> > > > I feel like they will push widgets as the primary application model
> > for
> > > > developers. Just my guy instinct based on issues around deployment,
> > > > updating, and a networked application model.
> > > >
> > > > +n
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > David King
> > davidleeking.com - blog
> > http://davidleeking.com/etc - videoblog
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


Reply via email to