This is something that's subject to ongoing negotiations, and I don't
want to damage those negotiations by coming down hard on one side or
another.  I will say that the closer they hew to best practices as a
matter of policy, the more likely it is that we'll go to an "opt-out"
strategy, like other partners.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 8:48 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy and Magnify and 
> aggregators in general
> 
> Thanks for your considerable and valuable effort on these 
> important matters Mike.  
> 
> One thing, though.  You wrote:  
> 
> "Because of Magnify's current position on advertising we are 
> considering the possibility of making the default position 
> for Magnify "opt-out" rather than opt-in ... Content creators 
> who are okay with player-adjacent AdSense advertisements 
> because they want the extra traffic that Magnify may generate 
> will easily be able to opt in."
> 
> So is it an "opt-in" or an "opt-out" strategy for Magnify?  
> 
> -David
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >  
> > I just wanted to give everyone an update on where we stand with
> MyHeavy
> > and Magnify, since I've met with the CEOs both companies in 
> the last 
> > three days.  Both of the meetings were for the same purpose -- they
> took
> > place because people on this list complained about the way the
> companies
> > were aggregating their videos.  The meeting agenda was simple: to
> work
> > with these companies to allow them to meet their business goals
> without
> > infringing on the copy or other rights of original content creators.
> >  
> > Both meetings went well.  MyHeavy removed aggregated video content
> from
> > its site immediately after we spoke on the phone.  This was an easy 
> > thing for them to do, since for them aggregation is a feature of a 
> > larger business.  In the case of Magnify it's much more difficult
> to do
> > this because their entire business is based on aggregation.
> >  
> > MyHeavy is planning to bring aggregation back, but to do so 
> in a way 
> > that conforms with the best practices that have been (I believe)
> largely
> > agreed upon and endorsed by this group.  Specifically, they 
> will not 
> > include advertising in the playback experience without express 
> > permission from original content creators; they will not watermark
> the
> > video; they will give credit by prominently noting the original
> source
> > of the video in the form of a link to the original content
> creator's Web
> > site; and they will allow content creators to control aggregation 
> > through support for the MediaRSS restriction standard (whch will be 
> > controllable through a MyHeavy aggregation control panel in the
> blip.tv
> > Dashboard).
> >  
> > Magnify continues to aggregate blip.tv video to their destination
> sites,
> > and they are currently including Google AdSense advertisements on
> pages
> > that include video players from other sources, including blip.tv.  
> We
> > are currently working with Magnify's CEO to determine how best to 
> > address this issue, since Magnify's entire business model is based
> on
> > the ability to monetize aggregators through advertising.  Either
> way,
> > Magnify has agreed to support the MediaRSS restriction standard in
> the
> > same way as MyHeavy and others.  You will be able to control
> aggregation
> > to Magnify through a control panel in the blip.tv Dashboard.  
> Because of
> > Magnify's current position on advertising we are considering the 
> > possibility of making the default position for Magnify "opt-out"
> rather
> > than opt-in (unlike providers who adhere closely to all points of
> the
> > best practices).  Content creators who are okay with 
> player-adjacent 
> > AdSense advertisements because they want the extra traffic that
> Magnify
> > may generate will easily be able to opt in.
> >  
> > Please let me know if these are acceptable outcomes for you, and
> we'll
> > proceed with implementation with both companies.
> >  
> > -------
> > Mike Hudack
> > CEO, blip.tv
> >  
> > Office: 917-546-6989
> > AIM: mikehudack
> >  
> > Read the blip.tv blog: http://blog.blip.tv/
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to