Or of course you could just work with people tring to standardise all meta data for video which would include a license portion.
Dean --- In [email protected], "Bill Cammack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I see... You're not talking about prevention. You're talking about > recourse. > > Prevention could (hypothetically) consist of either something in the > feed that blocks aggregators from slurping videos from your feed or > something visual in your video that alerts potential aggregators that > there are going to be "consequences & repercussions" if they utilize > your video in ways that your chosen license doesn't allow. > > The problem with visual prevention is that nobody's watching your > videos. They're automatically taking the entire blip feed that just > happens to have your videos included. Therefore, whether you show an > "All Rights Reserved" card on your video or a "Creative Commons > [whatever]" card, nobody sees it. > > The problem with prevention via feed is that there's no telling what > the aggregator's going to do with your video. There's nothing that > sends to blip "I intend to put a full-screen ad in front of your > 280-pixel-wide video and flank it with chicks in lingerie without > linking back to you or crediting anyone as the content creator" so > that blip could automatically veto their "application" for your video. > Instead, it's up to the aggregator to search the information in the > feed and go "oh... She put a Non-Commercial license on her video... > Which means that we aren't supposed to put ads on it.... And we INTEND > to put ads on it, so don't take that particular video, check her next > video for an incompatible license". > > On top of all that, in this case, when you told them about your issue, > they told you "I can't do nothin' for ya, man", and claimed to be > insulated from dealing with you directly because they're aggregating a > different site that already aggregated you. > > Short of "Whack-A-Mole" (or not using RSS at all), prevention is > currently impossible. > > Recourse is where a traditional license might help you out....... or not. > > -- > Bill C. > http://ReelSolid.TV > > > --- In [email protected], "Gena" <compumavengal@> wrote: > > > > My thoughts about a traditional license was that if I had to fight to > > prevent uses in situations I didn't want my videos to appear I would > > be on established legal ground. > > > > From a practical standpoint it would be easier to convince a judge my > > rights instead of educating him/her on CC licenses. > > > > I'm not going to switch anytime soon. I am considering it at this > > point because this is the second of many more instances of this kind > > of robbery. > > > > I also feel that the lawyers for Google Video, YouTube, Daily Motion > > and other services that are being ripped off may be planning their own > > response to this kind of theft. Cuz that what it is, they take Google > > Video RSS feed, set up shop and then have the nerve to slap ads from > > Google Adsense above it is just asking for trouble. > > > > Here is the deal. I want a tool or practical approach to deal with > > this kind of problem. I want something I can do that doesn't require > > the intervention of a third party. (But much appreciated.) > > > > I want something that I can use and can explain to another person if > > this happens here is what you can do about it. I think that what we > > are all peculating on. > > > > Gena > > > > > > Can you expand on that? What kind of license are you going to get > > > that would make any difference to someone aggregating RSS feeds? > > > > > > It's not "Creative Commons" that's being disrespected. They're > > > ignoring everything except the fact that you made a video and they can > > > subscribe to your feed. > > > > > > Do you think they actually _watch_ the videos they aggregate to see if > > > there's a licensing block at the end? Do you think, especially given > > > the response you received in this case, that they would bother to > > > remove each particular individual feed whose license they were > > > disregarding? CC or Traditional? > > > > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "switching to a > > > traditional license". > > > > > > -- > > > Bill C. > > > http://ReelSolid.TV > > > > > >
