Bah, standards ;) 

but, yes, good point.

--
Devlon Duthie
http://devlonduthie.com

Find great independent video:
http://mefeedia.com



Joshua Kinberg wrote:
>> Although I agree with you Josh, why is class=media-thumbnail better than
>> rel=thumbnail in this example?
>> (It's consistent?)
>>     
>
> The only reason is that rel is not valid XHTML attribute for <img>
>
> -josh
>
>
> On 2/9/07, Devlon Duthie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> Although I agree with you Josh, why is class=media-thumbnail better than
>> rel=thumbnail in this example?
>> (It's consistent?)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Devlon Duthie
>> http://devlonduthie.com
>>
>> Find great independent video:
>> http://mefeedia.com
>>
>>
>>
>> Joshua Kinberg wrote:
>>     
>>>> class="media-thumbnail" ?
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Yes, I think a class attribute on the image is good -- all that is
>>> needed is standardization on the class name.
>>>
>>> Also, it would make sense if the image were contained within some type
>>> of block that refers to the video, like this:
>>>
>>> <a href="http://link/to/video.mov"; rel="enclosure">
>>> <img src="http://link/to/thumbnail.jpg"; class="media-thumbnail" />
>>> </a>
>>>
>>> That way, you would know which video the thumbnail image is referring to.
>>>
>>> my .02 cents...
>>>
>>>
>>> -Josh
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/9/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On 2/9/07, billshackelford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I agree.. mediaRSS already exists and is supported by many.
>>>>>
>>>>> --- In [email protected], sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> nah.
>>>>>> encourage mediaRSS spec for thumbnails.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and consider using blip feeds (blip users).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sull
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>> You're both COMPLETELY missing the point.
>>>>
>>>> This is NOT an alternative to mediaRSS. It's not an either or thing.
>>>> When you're composing a blog post you can't very well mark something
>>>> up in mediaRSS because you can only markup mediaRSS if you're actually
>>>> coding your own RSS feeds.  You need a way to be able to TELL
>>>> wordpress... or feedburner or whatever is creating your RSS feed...
>>>> heh this image, it is the thumbnail, please put it in the thumbnail
>>>> field of the RSS feed.
>>>>
>>>> Secondly... Sull, people cannot just go and use their blip feeds
>>>> instead of their  feedburner feeds.  Because their blogs are far more
>>>> than just videos from blip... their blogs contain text posts, and
>>>> blogged posts from flickr, and posts that are reblogged from others.
>>>> That makes about as much sense as telling them just to use their
>>>> delicious feed, or flickr feed instead of their blog.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe my post was to long or something, but I'm sort of disapointed in
>>>> the responses.
>>>>
>>>> Other than the fact that there is no "rel" atribute to <img> there's
>>>> no reason not to do this.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps andreas could suggest and alternative to "rel", or perhaps I'd
>>>> like to suggest playing the devils advocate, does it really matter if
>>>> there's no rel attribute to <img src>?   What's wrong with extending
>>>> it?  It guarantees there will be no conflicts, and it's in keeping
>>>> with other standards like relTag, relNoFollow, relEnclosure and many
>>>> others.
>>>>
>>>> Again just to play devils advocate... but what's wrong with extending
>>>> HTML with a rel standard?
>>>>
>>>> If that is evil incarnate what other choices do we have?
>>>>
>>>> class="media-thumbnail" ?
>>>>
>>>> I think this is already getting to convoluted... we need something the
>>>> everyday people can understand... getting people to make the jump from
>>>> rel= to class= is a big step to ask thousands of people to remember...
>>>> these are not coders they're bloggers.
>>>>
>>>> -Mike
>>>> mefeedia.com
>>>> mmeiser.com/blog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>>> On 2/8/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>   Yeah, maybe we should skip the whole overriding media microfotmat
>>>>>>> thing...
>>>>>>> and in true microformats style solve the simplest and most necissary
>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>> first.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I.E. <img src="" rel=thumbnail>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's actually hard for me to believe people aren't actually using this
>>>>>>> somewhere in the RSS-o-sphere. Has anyone seen anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It perfectly in keeping with other specs like rel=tag, rel=enclosure,
>>>>>>> rel=payment and a host of others.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It will also work with perfectly with other forms of media feeds like
>>>>>>> audio,
>>>>>>> and photocasts as well. It's a univeral element.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any objections to this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/8/07, duthied2004 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <duthied%40gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Hey all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've been out of the loop on this list for some time and have tried to
>>>>>>>> catch up on this, so forgive me if stuff has been said/asked
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>> before....
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> But, I'd love to hear how people are setting the thumbnails for their
>>>>>>>> entries....do you use mediarss on your site, is it only in the
>>>>>>>> 'description' of the post, in a thumbnail element in the item
>>>>>>>> elements? As Mike mentioned it's a hodge-podge currently.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Glad to see the same names on here still, as well as many more new
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>> ones.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>> -Devlon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- In [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>> <videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com>,
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> groups-yahoo-com@ wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>> There is also a larger issue Bill which Josh touched on.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The general problem is that while 90% (or some otherwise very hight
>>>>>>>>> percent of vloggers) have thumbnails in their posts they are not
>>>>>>>>> "semantically" specified. This is to say they are not specified in
>>>>>>>>> standard way which can be recognized by aggregators and search sites
>>>>>>>>> like Fireant, vlogdi, mefeedia and others. For example... eclosures
>>>>>>>>> can be specified in your blog post among other ways by a microformat
>>>>>>>>> standard "rel=enclosure". There is no standards for huge amounts of
>>>>>>>>> supporting meta infromation like thumbnails, i.e. there is no
>>>>>>>>> "rel=thumnail".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We're working on mechanisms not only to better identify thumbnails
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>> in
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>> blog posts, among other things, by creating a new media Microformat.
>>>>>>>>> It should not only have a tremendous immediate impact for people who
>>>>>>>>> use services like blip, feedburner, mefeedia, fireant and others,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>> but
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>> it should also put this control into YOUR hands if you like when
>>>>>>>>> you're writing a blog post.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> P.S. Josh, I hope you'll collaborate on this media microformat as
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>> well
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>> as sharing other ideas on sharing thumbnail information.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Mike
>>>>>>>>> mmeiser.com/blog
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/19/07, Peter Van Dijck <petervandijck@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                   
>>>>>>>>>> Hey Josh, I haven't checked that feature in like a year, so it may
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>> stopped working.. let Frank know if you have any questions about
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>> that, I'm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>> sure he'd be happy to get it running again.. all my fault!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/19/07, Joshua Kinberg <jkinberg@> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Bill,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We're currently working on this issue and plan to have a big new
>>>>>>>>>>> release of the FireAnt website in February. This new release
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>> will
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>>> support the Media RSS namespace for thumbnails.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Currently, we can grab thumbnails from blog posts if they are
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>> included
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>> in the link to the video enclosure file like this:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <a href="http://link/to/video.mov"; rel="enclosure"><img
>>>>>>>>>>> src="http://link/to/thumbnail/image.jpg"; /></a>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We also have the ability to get thumbnail images from MeFeedia,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>> but it
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>> seems that MeFeedia may have disabled this feature.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that helps explain... please stay tuned for our new website
>>>>>>>>>>> update that will address this along with many other bug fixes
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>> and new
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>> features.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>> Josh
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://FireAnt.tv
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/19/07, billshackelford
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>> <bshackelford@<bshackelford%40gmail.com>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>> My videos do not have thumbnails on FireAnt. It seems they do
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>>>>> utilize the Yahoo Media
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>> RSS namespace attributes. Is there a reason why? If there is a
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>> legal
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>> reason.. why don't they
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>> just come up with their own namespace?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe I read something about FireAnt getting thumbnails
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>> from
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>>>>>>> Mefeedia but my
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>> thumbnails show up Mefeedia fine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone know if there is something I can do to have my
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>> thumbnails
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>>>>>> show up on FireAnt?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>                       
>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my channel on FireAnt:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> billshackelford.com podcast
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://fireant.tv/directory/channel/22981
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>                         
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Find 10000s of videoblogs and podcasts at http://mefeedia.com
>>>>>>>>>> my blog: http://poorbuthappy.com/ease/
>>>>>>>>>> my job: http://petervandijck.net
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>                     
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sull
>>>>>> http://vlogdir.com (a project)
>>>>>> http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog)
>>>>>> http://interdigitate.com (otherly)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>>
>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>   

Reply via email to