Slightly on the subject, I use Adobe Premier 1.5 and I don't see H.264 as an option. I see H.262 and H.263, but no H.264. I have considered upgrading to 2.0, will that give me H.264 as an option?
Robyn Tippins ---- Sleepyblogger.com | Gamingandtech.com | Intel.com/software _____ From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Knight Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 10:06 AM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] DivX?? Unfortunately I have not got an ipod anymore so I really can't answer the ipod quandery, maybe some people could let you know on that one. But having said that divx uses H264 technology so you never know. Paul On 23 Feb 2007, at 13:19, Rupert wrote: > Aha! So this is what I was after. Your MOV or MP4 files are > actually compressed using the DivX codec? So all the mov or wmv > files I watch could be DivX without me knowing, and that's why I > never see mention of DivX? (I love risking looking stupid in > public.) So I could create a DivX file that's playable in Quicktime, > and another DivX file that's playable in Windows Media Player? Is > that right, Paul? Could I make an iPod or PSP compatible DivX file? > I love the use of the word 'Jacket' > I've just got back from holiday - hence the flurry of posts - and I > just caught up with your Comic Relief vlog, Paul. Nice one. Today's > the best yet. I particularly like the big eared red nosed quickie at > the end. > http://www.dailymot <http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x18zwg_comic-relief-2322007> ion.com/video/x18zwg_comic-relief-2322007 > R > > On 23 Feb 2007, at 12:48, Paul Knight wrote: > > I've bought it and love it, clarity and very small file sizes, as > well as the encoding is quick and you can play them on certain DVD > Players. > > I use a quicktime jacket when uploading to blip.tv and I have had no > complaints so far. > > Try it, why not. There is also a great community over at stage6.com > and you'll find a great deal of vlogging members there already. > > It works for me in so many ways, probably the best online thing I > bought since quicktime. > > Paul > > On 23 Feb 2007, at 10:20, Rupert wrote: > > > I feel a bit of a fool. I was talking to somebody about vlogging > > and they were raving to me about the quality and compression of > DivX. > > > > I don't know anything about DivX. I don't feel that much wiser after > > reading up about it on Wikipedia, DivX.com etc > > > > I don't know any vloggers who use it, and can't remember seeing a > > DivX labelled feed, the way many people list QT, WMV and iPod feeds. > > Why do so few people use it, when it would appear to be very popular > > among P2P video sharers? > > > > Every conversation about which formats to use, always discusses QT, > > MP4, Windows Media and Flash? When people talk about using Windows > > Media files, are they also assuming that DivX is under this banner, > > because Windows Media Player comes preinstalled with the DivX codec? > > > > And if so, why do people provide wmv files and feeds instead of > divx, > > if DivX is so much better? Or is it not? > > > > Yours confused > > > > Rupert > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
