Interesting!  They must have switched from AVI now that they do HD.
Thanks for the comparison vids.  Not much in it, except - as you say -  
the wider angle and the slightly better sound in the Canon.  When  
you're closer to the camera in a quiet interior, I'd imagine the  
difference in the Canon sound would be even greater in comparison to  
the Flip.  I'd say you need to be quite a lot closer to the camera to  
get clear sound - and the wider angle will help with that.

Vegas and .mov should be easy, though - not much adjustment required,  
I wouldn't think.

On 17-Aug-09, at 8:38 PM, Chad Boeninger wrote:

> Hi Rupert,
> I got a Canon SD 780 IS a few weeks ago, and it records in both HD  
> and SD
> as MOV files. I may have to take the plunge and get Vegas so I can  
> edit the
> MOV files. The trial of Vegas is working out pretty well, so it's a  
> matter
> of getting off my wallet when the trial expires. I did a comparison  
> of my
> various cameras a few days ago. The Canon video is
> http://libraryvoice.blip.tv/file/2476370/ , the Flip is
> http://libraryvoice.blip.tv/file/2476039/. Not exactly scientific,  
> as the
> files were rendered in different ways, but you get the idea that the  
> Canon
> does have slightly better quality, has a better mic, allows for  
> zooming (not
> while recording) and multiple exposure options. I'm not very  
> accustomed to
> working in non-WMV file formats, so Vegas and MOV may take getting  
> used to
> if I am to take full advantage of the Canon. Thanks for the input.
>
> --Chad
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Rupert Howe <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > I really recommend you check out the Canon's 640x480 picture and
> > sound. Canon's point and shoot cameras generally shoot fantastic
> > colours and have great sound. And obviously they double as great
> > stills cameras as well... so they're useful things to slip into your
> > pocket. I love them for videoblogging. Also Canon stores clips in
> > AVI files, which go into Movie Maker nicely.
> >
> > Rupert
> > http://twittervlog.tv
> >
> >
> > On 17-Aug-09, at 6:49 PM, Chad Boeninger wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > > I'm in the process of getting ready to expand my offering of
> > > educational
> > > library videos with a new show and would like some feedback.
> > > Basically the
> > > show will go as follows: 1. I introduce the topic on camera, 2. I
> > > show a
> > > screencast of a business database or website, 3. I sum up the
> > > episode on
> > > camera. (while not a business database video, this example,
> > > http://libraryvoice.blip.tv/file/2438408/ , gives you an idea of  
> the
> > > flow of
> > > the show) Currently my two options for recording the camera pieces
> > > are a
> > > Flip Mino and a Canon Elura 60 (a budget mini-DV camcorder from
> > > 2004). The
> > > camcorder was originally a gift when my first son was born, and I
> > > have not
> > > used it much. I'd like to get some more use out of it. However, it
> > > looks
> > > like my Flip Mino, which I've had for a year now, beats the  
> Canon in
> > > terms
> > > of video quality, but the Canon has louder audio. I'm a rookie  
> when it
> > > comes to messing with manual settings, but can you recommend
> > > anything that I
> > > can try to eek out better video from the Canon? For comparison of
> > > the two,
> > > take a look at this short video.
> > http://libraryvoice.blip.tv/file/2484863/
> > > .
> > >
> > > I've also got a Canon 780 IS that records HD video (as well as
> > > 640x480), but
> > > my computing power is not yet up to editing HD video.
> > >
> > > Any input you may have would be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Chad
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chad F. Boeninger
> > > libraryvoice.com - blog
> > > libraryvoice.com/videos - videoblog
> > > twitter.com/cfboeninger
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- 
> Chad F. Boeninger
> libraryvoice.com - blog
> libraryvoice.com/videos - videoblog
> twitter.com/cfboeninger
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to