:)
And both in the right spirit, bringing the right attitude, more social  
& level, without the nastiness of tone & the money issues.


On 16 Apr 2010, at 00:26, Roxanne Darling wrote:

> LOL! Irina brings the drama and fun factor and I sure as hell can  
> organize.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Rupert Howe <rup...@twittervlog.tv>  
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I thought earlier today that Irina should have been organising the
>> Streamys. Now I realise that Irina & Rox is the dream team. Someone
>> should tell them.
>>
>>
>> On 15 Apr 2010, at 23:57, Roxanne Darling wrote:
>>
>>> Irina: agreed on the dubious pay for play and "it feels good to be
>>> recognized for hard work."
>>> Rupert: agree that having more women involve might have helped and
>>> tech
>>> should have been the "given."
>>> Quirk: "People are rightfully pissed." Yeah.
>>> Mark: Disrespecting the audience is a clear problem, I agree. If you
>>> are
>>> going to make it R-rated, it's your choice, though you better pre-
>>> announce
>>> that.
>>>
>>> As a group, internet video has so much potential. But many of those
>>> who are
>>> inspired to take the lead on these things also seem to have serious
>>> issues
>>> with maturity and basic event promotion competence. I produced a
>>> podcamp
>>> here in 2008 - over 400 attended live and thousands more via
>>> livestream.
>>> There were no streakers or swear words and wow what a great time we
>>> had!
>>> Aunties were blogging by the end of the 2 days and our tag hit #1 on
>>> Twitter
>>> and Flickr - from a big crowd of newbies. We did no traditional
>>> marketing or
>>> advertising - all via social networks and WOM. So I know this can
>>> all be
>>> done using the tools we love and sharing the ideas we know are
>>> relevant and
>>> in demand.
>>>
>>> I detached from being part of the in crowd years ago, both because
>>> of the
>>> geographical isolation in Hawaii (I just can't drop in to the LA and
>>> NYC
>>> meetings and those crowds seem to forget there are others who don't
>>> show up
>>> in the F2F events) as well as not fitting in one of the mainstream
>>> categories. Surely our 4+ years, 760 episodes, nearly 3 M views, and
>>> literally saving a few lives has a place somewhere? :-)
>>>
>>> Often a big fail can open things up for enlightenment. I'm putting
>>> my vote
>>> in that direction.
>>>
>>> Now, onto brighter and happier thoughts!
>>>
>>> Love,
>>>
>>> Rox
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Irina <irina...@gmail.com<irinaski 
>>> %40gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> chance's story showed that charging nominees for participation is a
>>>> dubious
>>>> undertaking -- since without nominees there would be no industry
>>>> and no
>>>> "award show" in the first place. second of all, making anyone feel
>>>> left out
>>>> (since this is the web, which is pretty much an all-inclusive  
>>>> type of
>>>> environment) with special entrances and seating is another weird
>>>> idea.
>>>>
>>>> work on getting sponsors to pay for things so people dont have to.
>>>> thats
>>>> what sponsors are for. ergo, free food and liquor if i can help it.
>>>>
>>>> trust me, people brought their friends and kids to the vloggies and
>>>> the
>>>> winnies too. because its fun. and because it feels good to be
>>>> recognized
>>>> for
>>>> hard work.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Rupert Howe
>>>> <rup...@twittervlog.tv <rupert%40twittervlog.tv><rupert%
>> 40twittervlog.tv>>
>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm also glad that it wasn't like the Oscars. LA & NY people
>>>>> consolidating their power.
>>>>>
>>>>> And Chance's personal story is depressing, but really... the whole
>>>>> thing reads like a Greek tragedy. Pride before the fall. I mean,  
>>>>> he
>>>>> *really* thought he was going to the Oscars?? And brought all his
>>>>> friends and colleagues... and their children?! WTF.
>>>>>
>>>>> And I can't agree with the "It's terrible for the industry!"  
>>>>> people.
>>>>> It will be *good* for the profile of web video, not bad. I've seen
>>>>> enough intentionally controversial and offensive theatre in London
>>>>> and
>>>>> Edinburgh to know that controversy drives box office success, mass
>>>>> media interest and general awareness. Even if the show itself is a
>>>>> train wreck.
>>>>>
>>>>> So - it might be bad for the reputation of Tubefilter and the
>>>>> producers and the chances of getting sponsors for next year's
>>>>> awards -
>>>>> but not bad for web TV. More people will hear about web shows  
>>>>> now -
>>>>> in the knowledge that there was a big Awards ceremony for them.
>>>>>
>>>>> In everything I've read, everyone's giving them a pass on the tech
>>>>> problems and castigating them for the tone. Come on.
>>>>>
>>>>> They should be more ashamed of the tech problems than the poor
>>>>> taste.
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean, they were obviously *trying* to be 'edgy'. They got what
>>>>> they
>>>>> wanted, like ego-crazed geek frat boys. The whole thing reeks of  
>>>>> not
>>>>> enough women in charge. What a surprise.
>>>>>
>>>>> But surely the one thing that should have been *flawless* is the
>>>>> technical delivery.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not that hard to get sound right. You just have to hire a  
>>>>> live
>>>>> event sound engineer who knows what they're doing - and a live
>>>>> broadcast mixer & director & engineer who know what they're  
>>>>> doing (I
>>>>> mean, it's LA, for God's sake).
>>>>>
>>>>> And do rehearsals and sound checks. And if you can't do proper
>>>>> rehearsals in the venue, don't use the venue. If they were  
>>>>> expecting
>>>>> 750,000 viewers, it should have been ALL about the flawless live
>>>>> streaming of the content and perfect sound, surely - not about
>>>>> ohmygosh the Orpheum Theatre and the self-satisfied LA types in  
>>>>> the
>>>>> room?
>>>>>
>>>>> And above all, given that it's about web video, it should have  
>>>>> been
>>>>> short.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rupert
>>>>> http://twittervlog.tv
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12 Apr 2010, at 23:17, elbowsofdeath wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So I hear the Streamy's this year were a disaster in several key
>>>>>> ways and have gotten all the wrong sort of attention as a result.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is some concern that it has damaged the image of the
>>>>>> 'industry', although it may be easy to overstate this point. It
>>>>>> certainly didnt help, but the 'industry' has enough other  
>>>>>> problems
>>>>>> too, although anything that harms potential sponsorship by
>>>>>> appearing
>>>>>> to confirm potential sponsors worst fears (eg uncontrolled  
>>>>>> juvenile
>>>>>> amateurish smut tarnishing their brands) sounds bad to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately there is a part of me that is wildly entertained  
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> amused by the streamyfail, considering it to be some kind of
>>>>>> justice
>>>>>> on a certain level. This isnt fair, as no doubt lots of blameless
>>>>>> hard working people have been hurt by the streamyfail, but I
>>>>>> suppose
>>>>>> its a natural consequence of my disdain for the way some of the
>>>>>> more
>>>>>> visible parts of the 'industry' went, shoddy emulation of the
>>>>>> existing media. What better way to symbolise two worlds  
>>>>>> colliding,
>>>>>> and so much wasted potential, than to have a slick awards show
>>>>>> humbled by technical glitches and naked people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Steve Elbows
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://geekentertainment.tv
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Roxanne Darling
>>> "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian
>>> 808-384-5554
>>> Video --> http://www.beachwalks.tv
>>> Company -- > http://www.barefeetstudios.com
>>> Twitter--> http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling
>>>
>>>
>>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Yahoo! Groups Links
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Roxanne Darling
> "o ke kai" means "of the sea" in hawaiian
> 808-384-5554
> Video --> http://www.beachwalks.tv
> Company -- > http://www.barefeetstudios.com
> Twitter--> http://www.twitter.com/roxannedarling
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to