On 9/29/06, Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
From: "Yakov Lerner", Fri, September 29, 2006 2:24 pm > > There must have been reason for this > ("linebreak ... is not used when...'list' is on"). > > Is it because with list on, representation of tabs can be > different/incorrect from "correct" representation, and visual line > length will be incorrect ?I'd say this should only be the case if &list's tab representation differs (is only one char) from &tabstop, but otherwise it shouldn't.
That's right wrt visual line lengths. Going back to the "fix linebreak when list is on": (a) would it be good enough to fix it for the case when &list tab's representation is same as 'nolist' ? (i think this case is very easy to fix ), or (b) you want it fixed for both cases, also when "&list's tab representation differs (is only one char) from &tabstop" ? (the (b) case must be more difficult) ? So, did you mean (a) fix or (b) fix ? Yakov
