On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:06:38PM +0200, Milan Vancura wrote: > please stop one thing: some of you act as if creating git repository means > deletion of CVS and SVN trees and Bram's e-mail client! I don't remember so > hot > discussion when SVN started (and CVS was already up) so why now?
Why does the VCS type need to be discussed at all? Anyone is free to setup a repository using their favorite VCS and make it known here. If others want to make use of it, then they can. Bram has his workflow, which involves pushing to the CVS repository and everything else can be handled by other people that want to provide alternative resources. I somewhat understood when SVN was proposed since it's at least another service provided by Sourceforge. Now that those have been exhausted, no Sourceforge access is required and the service can be hosted elsewhere if someone feels strongly about it. IMO, there's no reason to bring up establishing a repository using $fancyNewVcs every time a new release appears. N.B., I do use git and find it very useful but that doesn't mean I feel the need to try and impose it on other people. -- James GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
