On 08/03/09 02:35, Matt Wozniski wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>> That's if you want Vim "for Cygwin". You can also use Cygwin to compile
>> ("cross-compile", if you want) versions of Vim which don't need Cygwin
>> to run, as explained on  my Windows HowTo
> Hm.  Support for using cygwin's gcc to do cross-compile builds is soon
> to be dropped.  Maybe we should remove the option to do this from
> Make_cyg.mak?  Or, at least add a note to the README noting that the
> option is deprecated and soon to be removed?
>
> ~Matt

The only interest of Make_cyg.mak is to compile Vim binaries which don't 
need Cygwin to run, using the -mno-cygwin option  of the Cygwin gcc 
compiler and the appropriate corresponding option of the linker.

If Cygwin drops the option, then you should not use Make_cyg.mak but 
switch (for instance) to MinGW and Make_ming.mak.

To compile a cygwin build which does require the cygwin1.dll to run, use 
the top-level Makefile and have it run configure (if it works, I haven't 
tested it).


Best regards,
Tony.
-- 
All the taxes paid over a lifetime by the average American are spent by
the government in less than a second.
                -- Jim Fiebig

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui