Dominique Pelle wrote:
> Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > > >> during some discussion with an Arch Linux user about the Arch Vim > >> package, we noticed the following: > >> > >> These files have been removed from the vim tarballs in June/July 2008, > >> but are still present on the ftp server and should be removed: > >>  /usr/share/vim/vim72/keymap/bulgarian.vim > >>  /usr/share/vim/vim72/tutor/README.gr.cp737.txt > >>  /usr/share/vim/vim72/tutor/README.gr.txt > >>  /usr/share/vim/vim72/tutor/tutor.gr > >>  /usr/share/vim/vim72/tutor/tutor.gr.cp737 > >>  /usr/share/vim/vim72/tutor/tutor.gr.utf-8 > > > > I'll delete them. > > > >> runtime/tutor/tutor.eo is not in any tarball yet, but on the ftp server. > >> But it's not listed in getunix.aap/getdos.aap. Because the official Arch > >> Vim package uses getunix.aap, tutor.eo is now missing in the > >> distribution. Should be added to these two file lists. > > > > There currently is no tutor.eo file.  Well, we could make a tutor.eo in > > latin-3.  Latin-1 does not work, thus people using latin-1 encoding will > > see tutor.eo with a few wrong characters.  Not sure if this is better > > than not having a tutor.eo file. > > > I only created the utf-8 versions of the Esperanto translation > to keep things simple. > > I think nobody uses latin3 code page anymore for Esperanto. > But if there is a need, we could add the file(s) in latin3. The advantage is that it's easy to create from the utf-8 version with iconv. > Latin1 cannot encode the accentuated letters, but it would be > possible to transliterate the Esperanto accentuated letters > (ĉ -> cx, Ä -> gx, etc) and thus use latin1. However, it would > require to maintain the translation utf-8 and latin1 separately > (transforming automatically would break some alignments). Manual maintenance is probably not worth it. > So to sum up, 3 possibilities: > > 1/ only utf-8 Esperanto files (as currently) > 2/ utf-8 + latin3 > 3/ utf-8 + latin1 after transliterating ĉ -> cx, Ä -> gx, etc. > > I prefer 1/ for simplicity but I'm fine with 2/ or 3/ as well > if you think it's worth. We can go with 2/. The only worry I have is that this is an 8-bit encoding, it can't be detected automatically. Thus people having 'enc' set at latin1 will see the wrong characters. Is that better than getting an error message? -- Futility Factor: No experiment is ever a complete failure - it can always serve as a negative example. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
