Hello Gary and Christian,
Excerpt from Christian Brabandt: > On Di, 15 Mai 2012, Gary Johnson wrote: >> I like it. >> >> Do you think there would be enough maintenance traffic to justify a >> separate runtime-maintainers list or would vim-dev suffice? > > +1 > > If the traffic isn't too big, I would prefer vim-dev list (since I am > already subscribed) so please add me to the list ;) Seems we get it moving. Sounds great. :) Personally i do not have any preference where this list is located. Regarding using vim-dev i think we should also ask Bram what he thinks about that, cc'ed. Bram what do you think putting runtimefiles under team maintenance and using vim-dev for coordination of that group? > regards, > Christian > -- Regards, Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
