Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote:
> [] inside \%[] doesn't work with new regex engine.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> $ vim -u NONE
> :echo match('a', '\%#=1\%[[a]]')
> 0
> :echo match('a', '\%#=2\%[[a]]')
> INTERNAL: Negative state char: -165
> INTERNAL: Negative state char: -165
> -1
Thanks for reporting this.
The \%[] item didn't support nesting at all. Fortunately it's easy to
fix. And then it will support anything (unlike the old engine).
--
"Marriage is a wonderful institution...
but who wants to live in an institution?"
- Groucho Marx
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
