Andy Wokula wrote:
> Am 17.06.2013 21:33, schrieb Bram Moolenaar:
> >
> > Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote:
> >
> >> [] inside \%[] doesn't work with new regex engine.
> >>
> >> Steps to reproduce:
> >> $ vim -u NONE
> >> :echo match('a', '\%#=1\%[[a]]')
> >> 0
> >> :echo match('a', '\%#=2\%[[a]]')
> >> INTERNAL: Negative state char: -165
> >> INTERNAL: Negative state char: -165
> >> -1
> >
> > Thanks for reporting this.
> >
> > The \%[] item didn't support nesting at all. Fortunately it's easy to
> > fix. And then it will support anything (unlike the old engine).
>
> Literal `]' inside `\%[...]' required escaping as `[]]'.
> Is this still the case?
Yep. I should add a test for that.
> Escaping as `\]' would be nice.
Well, then it would be incompatible with the old engine. Putting
a character inside [] for escaping is actually more consistent than
using a backslash.
--
"Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife
would have preferred"
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
