On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Shane Thornton <[email protected]> wrote: > If I put my cursor on the C in that first sentence, then try to navigate to > the <space> before "noticed" by using only the 'tn' or ';' command I am > unable to do so. The cursor will get caught at the <space> before "new". > However, if I do the same thing using 'fn' and ';' I have no issues, except > the cursor is on "n" in noticed. It does work with the number modifier, but > it would be better without using them, and just tapping ';' to get there if > I'm editing fast and don't want to count characters. This is helpful when > till-tapping over to somewhere, then hitting 'v' for visual mode, then > till-tapping over to the end letter and using an operator for the selection. > With Vim's current behavior that is not possible, and although I understand > it would change something, I think it would change it in a way that it would > fix existing issues and not interrupt anyone's expectations of how the > program should behave, it would instead just make it behave it a way that one > would expect. The idea of using n/N instead of ;/, is probably a little over > the top, but the above idea and making it multiline I think would hurt anyone.
You need to upgrade to a newer version of Vim http://stackoverflow.com/a/15669344 There's a popular plugin to make fFtT;, multi-line https://github.com/dahu/vim-fanfingtastic -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
