Ben Fritz wrote:
> On Aug 2, 2:52 am, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I find it more important to support Windows 7, so unless we find a way
> > to support Windows 2000 without breaking Windows 7 compatibility it
> > won't change.
> >
>
> Is there a problem with providing two installers/binaries, one for
> Win7 64 bit, and 1 for other Windows versions? Many other applications
> I've used do it this way.
The problem was not with 64 bit but with Windows 2000. Apparently it's
caused by using MSVC 2010. I'll try building with MSVC 2008.
I just read that Windows 2000 still has 1% market share. It's going
down rapidly though.
--
It's totally unfair to suggest - as many have - that engineers are socially
inept. Engineers simply have different objectives when it comes to social
interaction.
(Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
