On Aug 3, 3:54 pm, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote: > Ben Fritz wrote: > > On Aug 2, 2:52 am, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote: > > > > I find it more important to support Windows 7, so unless we find a way > > > to support Windows 2000 without breaking Windows 7 compatibility it > > > won't change. > > > Is there a problem with providing two installers/binaries, one for > > Win7 64 bit, and 1 for other Windows versions? Many other applications > > I've used do it this way. > > The problem was not with 64 bit but with Windows 2000. Apparently it's > caused by using MSVC 2010. I'll try building with MSVC 2008. >
Right, so maybe the installers would be differently separated, but the gist of my suggestion is: Installer A will contain a Vim compiled with MSVC 2008 Installer B will contain a Vim compiled with MSVC 2010 Or is it too difficult/expensive to have multiple versions of Visual Studio in a side-by-side installation? -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
