Втр, 03 Авг 2010, Ben Fritz писал(а): > > > On Aug 3, 3:54 pm, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ben Fritz wrote: > > > On Aug 2, 2:52 am, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I find it more important to support Windows 7, so unless we find a way > > > > to support Windows 2000 without breaking Windows 7 compatibility it > > > > won't change. > > > > > Is there a problem with providing two installers/binaries, one for > > > Win7 64 bit, and 1 for other Windows versions? Many other applications > > > I've used do it this way. > > > > The problem was not with 64 bit but with Windows 2000. Apparently it's > > caused by using MSVC 2010. I'll try building with MSVC 2008. > > > > Right, so maybe the installers would be differently separated, but the > gist of my suggestion is: > > Installer A will contain a Vim compiled with MSVC 2008 > Installer B will contain a Vim compiled with MSVC 2010 > > Or is it too difficult/expensive to have multiple versions of Visual > Studio in a side-by-side installation? >
Unless there are some features that only present in msvc 2010, I think it will be better to use the older one. IIRC it was very annoying that msvc 200? that required installation of its version specific msvcrt or need setting a manifest file. -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 -- You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
