On 12-01-12 13:07 , sc wrote:
On Thursday, January 12, 2012 11:33:49 Marc Weber wrote:
What's the problem with them? No static typing. Using JS its
you having the choice because many compilers compile down to
JS. I'm pretty sure that JS is faster due to jitting. I
haven't done benchmarking - but its incredible what those
engines do today.
speaking for myself alone, i hate javascript because it's got
the word java in its name, and for years i was forced to use
java -- it was the language du jour -- debugging large buggy
projects was a living nightmare because of the way the garbage
collector would kick in at different times
That's probably the worst reason I've ever heard to hate Javascript...
To quote someone funnier than I, "Java is to Javascript as ham is to
hamster". :)
Not that we get votes, but if we did, most of what I want would be to be
able to write the equivalent of:
python << EOF
import os
import sys
import vim
for p in sys.path:
if p!="" and os.path.isdir(p):
vim.command(r"set path+=%s" % (p.replace(" ", r"\ ")))
EOF
in Javascript.
Later,
Blake.
--
You received this message from the "vim_use" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
