At 12:51 AM 08/30/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>On a half-related note, how restrictive is the 512x384 resolution of the 
>12" monitor? I haven't used one of those 12" monitors but I've heard 
>that they're really small. It doesn't really matter because I won't be 
>using the computer much (I'll be using my dual G4/500 and my PowerBook 
>G3), but I would be interested to hear about it.

I use a lot of the 12" monitors, for the machines I'm giving away.  The
resolution is crisp and they are very useable for word processing (which is
what I set these machines up to do.)  I also like to use them for my test
monitors, when I'm working on machines.  They really are handy to have and
use--they take up a lot less space than a standard sized monitor.
Teri Pittman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
New and improved site: http://www.xws.com/terispage/

-- 
Vintage Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

 Small Dog Electronics    http://www.smalldog.com   | Enter To Win A |
 -- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras start at $299   |  Free iBook!   |

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Vintage Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/vintagemacs.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/vintage.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to