Hi, thanks all for your thoughts regarding the replacement of a dedicated 
Braille notetaker with a Braille display and iDevice.

 

I’m bummed to hear about the Brailliant BI 40. Humanware makes awesome 
displays, or is it Baum who manufactures their Braille cells? Regardless, the 
crisp quality is fantastic, and despite their advances in software, it’s a feat 
HIMS has not been able to match. The problem with the Brailliant is the lack of 
notetaking support. I need to be able to whip out a display and input data, 
sometimes in secure environments where Bluetooth and/or wi-fi is not accessible.

 

The Braille Edge seems promising. Cost-wise at $3,000 it’s in the middle of the 
pack. I much prefer Humanware’s thumb keys to navigate back and forth. I can’t 
come up with many cons against it come to think of it.

 

The VarioUltra is the next best option, but at $4,000 it’s certainly requiring 
more of a fascination to justify the expense. It does have notetaking ability 
and I hear the Braille display quality is superb. If the price weren’t so 
high...

 

The thought of bypassing iOS and connecting to my Windows ultrabook is another 
possibility as someone mentioned. Yet, even as small as my ultrabook is, it 
would still not be as portable as linking up to my phone.

 

I read back over my writing and sound like a whiny brat to myself. Still, it 
can’t be as difficult as it is to get a good input method down for someone 
interested in reading Braille! Anyway, thanks guys for entertaining my 
questions and for your suggestions.

 

Joe

 

--

Musings of a Work in Progress:

www.JoeOrozco.com/

 

Twitter: @ScribblingJoe

 

From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Cristóbal
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 3:02 PM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Replacing Braille Notetaker with iDevice

 

Somewhat back to the original inquiry, if Braille is such a vital part of the 
job, and if you’re an experienced Windows based screen reader, then maybe 
consider looking into one of those windows based tablets. Dell Venue or Toshiba 
Encore for example. A 2gb model wont’ run you more than $250.00 and probably 
less if you really hunt for a deal or don’t’ mind going refurbished or used. 
Apple is great and all, but perhaps in a circumstance like this, for practicle 
purposes, going for more robust and reliable Braille support may be the way to 
go. Perhaps use cloud based services in order to have as much synchronicity on 
Windows and i-devices as well. Perhaps not ideal since you’d be talking about a 
totally separate device and reliance on Internet access, but there you go.

 

 

From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Paul Hunt
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 11:45 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Replacing Braille Notetaker with iDevice

 

Hello Jonnathan. I have two questions for you.

1. When using a focus 40 blue with IOS devices, does the focus ever lock up 
when you are writing braille?  Do you have a 16 32 or 64 bit IOS device?

2. Does Apple have to write drivers for each braille display? What part do the 
braille display manufacturers play in making sure their devices work with IOS? 
I'm asking you because you were vice president of Hardware products with 
Freedom Scientific so your experience here may halp us in our advocacy efforts.

As far as the Humanware Firmware update is concerned, it did nothing to resolve 
the problem of the Brailliant locking up.

Thanks so much.

 

Paul

 

From: viphone@googlegroups.com [mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Jonathan Mosen
Sent: Sunday, June 21, 2015 7:35 AM
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Replacing Braille Notetaker with iDevice

 

Hi Paul, I wish I had a better answer other than continuing to write to Apple 
Accessibility, and putting pressure on via those who make the purchasing 
decisions about these devices.

We have to stand firm and let them know the implementation isn't fit for 
purpose.

You're absolutely on the right track with your diagnosis. If your display is 
working fine with other solutions such as a laptop, then clearly we're dealing 
with a driver issue, and Apple writes all the drivers to talk to the various 
Braille displays. No matter what Braille display we're using, we're going to 
have the contracted input issues because they're a function of iOS.

I think frustration is mounting because people have been pointing out these 
issues for some years now.

One thing that hasn't yet been done, and in my view should be, is an Applevis 
campaign of the month. I've not seen such a campaign for a while now, but 
Applevis has gone after third-party developers who've provided a less than 
optimal experience for VO users. So with something as critical as our very 
literacy, this is an issue that warrants the site's serious attention in my 
opinion.

Jonathan Mosen,

Mosen Consulting

Blindness technology information, eBooks and training

http://Mosen.org


On 21/06/2015, at 11:31 pm, Paul Hunt <prhu...@att.net> wrote:

Hello everybody. I would like to make this discussion practical. I have chosen 
not to purchase a dedicated notetaker when a laptop and screen reader give me 
more features more timely and at a lower price. Sometimes I don't want to carry 
a laptop. Since Apple has built braille display support into Voiceover, I 
expect it to be properly implemented and to work flawlessly.

I own a Humanware Brailliant BI 40 and a 16 gig iPhone 5S. I can read all day 
long but when I write, the BI 40 locks up and by the time I recover I've missed 
some notes during meetings, etc. I've tried to work with both companies. 
Instead of solving the problem, they are blaming each other. Since Apple has 
the resources and controls the environment I expect Apple to take the lead and 
I expect Humanware to work with Apple to resolve the issue. How can we promptly 
get their attention when the usual channels of communication don't work?

On Jun 21, 2015, at 12:20 AM, Jonathan Mosen <jmo...@mosen.org> wrote:

Tara, yet again you are misrepresenting my comments.

In saying that Apple has chosen to be a screen reader company, I am not saying 
they shouldn't have, and I think I made that very clear. Like many people on 
this list, my life is enriched every day by the fact that Apple has chosen to 
be a screen reader company. And you can find many books and blog posts I've 
written, as well as media interviews I've done, where I make this point.

I am saying, however, that they should be held to no lesser standard than any 
other screen reader company. When Apple developed their own Maps app in iOS 6, 
this made them a navigation company. They blew it, big time, consumers 
objected, and Apple made a course correction. That's because, quite rightly, 
consumers held Apple to the same standard that they did other maps providers.

Let me reiterate that I don't beleive a notetaker is the best choice in all 
situations. A good PC or Windows tablet will be far cheaper, and in some cases, 
far better, for many people.

 

Jonathan Mosen,

Mosen Consulting

Blindness technology information, eBooks and training

http://Mosen.org


On 21/06/2015, at 4:19 pm, TaraPrakash <taraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:

All the points about the utility of Braille are well taken, Jonathan's concern 
about survival about Braille, and that those who know Braille are  more 
successful in employment field is also agreeable to me (Even if I am not sure 
the source of this statistics that Jonathan quoted in his response addressed to 
me..)

The problem for me is his assertion that Apple has decided to become a screen 
reader company etc .... What I read in that comment is a suggestion that Apple 
shouldn't have ventured in to providing screen support as there are specialists 
for it. That somehow the assistive technology specialist companies 
are doing a better job for promotion of braille than apple. So, here is my 
suggestion for humanware and freedom scientific who are likely to listen to 
Jonathan, whose work with those companies has been commendable; and these 
companies hardly face any resolution against them in the conventions of 
blindness organizations who represent the blind. Let Freedom Scientific and 
Humanware make the braille note takers at the same price as the price of their 
note takers without braille. Voice sense, voice note and Packmate without 
Braille display sell for around 3500. with braille option they sell close to 
6500. Why that extra price for Braille? Is it acceptable at all to have these 
devices without braille as they are meant for the purpose of the blind and it 
has been established that blind are more successful if they learn braille? Even 
if they well their devices without Braille, is it acceptable that they charge 
so much extra for their Braille note takers? I would like some comments on that.

Now, you may say that it's okay charge me extra but give me a better braille 
support but I am not sure if that will be acceptable to those who seem to speak 
for all of us with regard to braille. 

I am sorry I do not want to cause any debate about this issue on this list, but 
when someone linked with blindness "speciality" devices and software suggest 
that if apple has come in to screen reading support , it has to be perfect, I 
find myself very skeptical about the added justiification about survival of 
braille and literacy etc. True apple's braille support is not perfect, but it 
will be wrong to assume that a dedicated note taker is going to perform any 
better for you than an I device with a braille display. braille note takers are 
improving but they are not still the paragons of perfection. the makers of 
those devices claim that they are fully functional computers, those who have 
those note takers know that they are anything but. They are still slow, clunky 
and love to hang from time to time. I would suggest to schedule a meeting with 
an organization that sells these note takers, and work on them for an hour or 
so. make sure to try their web browser, and their capacity to play large books. 
and then decide about purchasing a dedicated note taker.

 


Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 20, 2015, at 10:29 PM, denise avant <denise.av...@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello all,

Sometimes I wonder if just because we ask Apple to provide better Braille 
display  support, people think we are unnecessarily critical  of Apple. I am 
forever grateful to Apple for building in accessibility to all of its products. 
What Apple has done over the last six years is positively wonderful. I never 
thought I’d be able to do so many things with a visual device, and pay the same 
price as everyone else.  But that does not mean that blind people cannot and 
should not point out a flaw and demand better in a product. I listen to other 
podcasts having nothing to do with accessibility and Apple, and the sighted 
community is not hesitant to say when something needs to work better. 

If one of the screen reader companies fails to provide proper Braille display 
support in Windows, those of us, who use Windows are all over the company. 
Requesting good Braille input and output on an Apple device is not a ridiculous 
one. apple is the only one who can make the braille display support better. I 
don’t know if Apple cannot or will not make the Braille experience better. But 
voiceover belongs to apple, and I applaude those who are willing to stand up 
and ask for better.

Jonathan talks about the children all of the time. But blind adults need to be 
literate as well. 

 Perhaps people have their own reasons for wanting to simply rely on speech 
output. but I know there are times when people who cannot see well enough to 
read the screen need to use Braille.

If someone has a hearing impairment in addition to blindness, then a Braille 
display with an Apple device may be essential to using the device.

Also, there may be times when you need to read and write Braille without 
disturbing others or having the constant feedback of the speech.

 

On Jun 20, 2015, at 2:35 PM, TaraPrakash <taraprak...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

Yet, this is the majority opinion. Some people may be more worried about 
braille which is a good thing to have as an option. and blind children must 
have the option to learn braille. but somehow it's apple's responsibility to 
keep the braille alive, is disingenuous in my opinion. your 6,500 device is not 
fast or durable or efficient enough even for the blind as apple devices have 
become.  those who work in the field of assistive devices have their vvested 
interest in bringing in the braille issue with some emotions about survival and 
identity. 



Sent from my iPhone


On Jun 20, 2015, at 2:17 PM, Alex Hall < <mailto:mehg...@icloud.com> 
mehg...@icloud.com> wrote:

What I've found is that I don't need braille output at all. Please understand 
this is *my* opinion and situation, and I kknow everyone's is different. I'm 
not telling you what you should do, just offering my observations, for what 
they're worth.

 

I used a notetaker in school and college, but slowly used it less and less. 
Today, I use a Macbook Air and iPhone for everything. Sure, sometimes it's not 
quite as efficient at certain things, but it more than makes up for that in the 
app selection and raw horsepower. Plus, the efficiency offered by Dropbox, 
iCloud, Handoff, and other cloud services can't be forgotten; sure, typing your 
notes into a notetaker might be a few seconds faster, but you'll have to spend 
more time syncing up those notes to your computer later. With my setup, I can 
type notes on either device and have them appear instantly on the other, and 
with braille screen input or Mbraille on iOS, I can do it in braille.

 

A lot of it comes down to what you'll need and how you operate. As you said, 
the central problem is that a display plus an iOS device is cheaper, more 
modular, more powerful, and more versatile. However, a dedicated notetaker is 
more efficient, for certain tasks, and can more easily be used on the go or in 
noisy situations. Unfortunately, there's no perfect solution to the problem 
right now.

On Jun 20, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Joe < <mailto:jsoro...@gmail.com> 
jsoro...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

Jonathan,

 

Excellent blog post as always. Only, while I agree children are crucial, adult 
professionals should receive equal consideration. I was beginning to lean 
toward using a Braille display with an iDevice as a viable solution, but your 
points give me pause. I need to be able to be as productive as I can be using 
Braille on a dedicated notetaker. The apps on the more sophisticated Braille 
Sense are great but still limited. That means I could go for a compromise, 
purchasing one of the awkward hybrids like the Braille Edge or VarioUltra, but 
it doesn’t seem as though I could fully harness the horse power of the iDevice 
if the interaction between display and iOS is efficient. Any further thoughts 
welcomed. My point here isn’t to stir up a debate of notetakers versus 
displays. I need to be productive on the move. A full notetaker can be 
cost-prohibitive. A display doesn’t seem to be the most efficient option. LOL I 
thought we’d made a little more progress.

 

Joe

 

--

Musings of a Work in Progress:

 <http://www.joeorozco.com/> www.JoeOrozco.com/

 

Twitter: @ScribblingJoe

 

From:  <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> viphone@googlegroups.com [ 
<mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 
Jonathan Mosen
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 1:32 AM
To:  <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> viphone@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Replacing Braille Notetaker with iDevice

 

Hi Joe, I want to address your question about Braille input in iOS. In my view 
it is not fit for purpose. I don't know what it is about Braille input Apple 
doesn't get, whether the blind people they consult with about these things 
aren't Braille users, or what the deal is. They have the financial and 
technical resources to fix the issues if they were of a mind to, but sadly it 
appears we are going to see another major release of iOS without appropriately 
robust Braille input being available.

As you know, some manufacturers have chosen to do Apple's work for them, and 
work around the woeful Braille input in iOS by keeping text in a buffer, then 
sending it to iOS all at once. I guess this is a pragmatic response, but it 
also let's Apple off the hook. Apple is a mainstream technology company, but 
they have also made the choice to be a screen reader company, and I don't 
believe they should be held to any lesser standard than any other screen reader 
company.

They are receiving awards and praise and I don't begrudge them any of it. It is 
well deserved. But those of us who are passionate about not just the spread of 
Braille, but the very survival of Braille, need to stand up and be counted.

There's no doubt that notetaker products can no longer keep up with the 
phrenetic pace of technology, if they ever really could. So just in terms of 
the range of things that can be done, getting an iThing is probably a better 
bet than a notetaker. And some adults may well be confident enough in their 
Braille skills to work around the shortcomings in Apple's Braille input.

What really concerns me though is the kids, and in this case I believe 
notetakers will have a place unless and until Apple get it together when it 
comes to Braille input.

I am pasting below a blog post I wrote a couple of years ago called "The Apple 
Braille Crisis, it's got to be fixed for the kids". While some minor changes 
were made in iOS 8, it is mostly still relevant. Here it is.

People from all walks of life, not just blind people, can get extremely 
partisan about their technology preferences. Anything their team does is 
unquestionably wonderful, while anything another company does is rubbish, 
simply by virtue of the fact that it’s the other guys who did it. If you 
criticise the company such people support, you’ve committed heresy.

As blind people, I don’t believe we have the luxury of being so childish. 
Unemployment is high. Misconceptions abound regarding how capable we can be in 
the workplace, and in society as a whole. We need to be open to all solutions, 
and where possible, use the best mix of technology we can to be as productive, 
functional and self-reliant as we can.

To be clear, I have enormous admiration for the way Apple has changed the game 
in assistive technology. When they released VoiceOver in 2009, I was concerned 
that Apple might do just enough to get people off its back regarding the 
inaccessibility of the iPhone. But that has not been the case. With every 
release, Apple has added tangible enhancements such as alternative forms of 
input, innovative ways for us to use the camera, and so much more. So Apple’s 
commitment to accessibility is real, its ongoing, and it has earned enormous 
praise and respect.

Is there a “but” coming? Yes, there is, actually., because being grateful for a 
product doesn’t mean we don’t have rights as paying consumers to point out 
where a product falls short. But more than that, if Apple’s innovations risk 
killing off a category of product, and the literacy of our kids is threatened, 
we have a moral obligation to speak up constructively and ask Apple to engage 
with us as a community about fixing the issue.

The Internet is buzzing with reports of bugs in iOS 7. I’m not unduly concerned 
about most of these, because I believe the majority of them will come out in 
the wash. iOS 7 was a massive refactoring of the OS. I hope that there’ll be 
fixes released steadily across the coming year.

However, I am deeply troubled by Apple’s ongoing apparent failure to understand 
what constitutes Braille support of an appropriate quality. We’re not talking 
bugs in this case, we’re talking a fundamental user interface failure – a 
feature not fully fit for purpose.

Since Braille was introduced in iOS, it has supported contracted Braille in 
English markets. This is a means by which space is saved, and speed increased, 
by using a series of symbols and abbreviations. When one reads contracted 
Braille in iOS, it works quite well. When one writes it, it is the worst 
implementation of contracted input I’ve ever used on any device.

Since its inception, if you input a letter in contracted Braille which would be 
the abbreviation for a word if surrounded by spaces, iOS expands the word it 
represents if you pause for a short time before inputting the next character. 
For example, write “p” and it will quickly be expanded to the word “people”. If 
you are proofing a document you’ve brailled and wish to insert a letter in the 
middle of a word, you must preface the letter with a letter sign, dots 5-6, to 
prevent it from being expanded. This is not in accordance with the Braille code 
and is simply wrong.

Apple must surely know about this poor implementation. It’s been talked about 
in many forums, including an excellent presentation by Judy Dixon at the CSUN 
Technology Conference on Persons with Disabilities. I, and I’m sure others, 
have also raised it.

It’s also evident that Apple knows about the issues, because to its credit, it 
appears to at least have made an effort to try and fix the problem in iOS 7. It 
now offers an “Automatic Braille Translation” toggle. This feature is so below 
par compared with most of the design of all other VoiceOver features, that it 
must surely be the case that Apple is getting no advice, or poor advice, from 
anyone actually using Braille in their daily life.

When you toggle “Automatic Braille Translation” off, you can take as long as 
you wish when inputting characters, and they’re not back-translated. Isn’t that 
what we want? Well yes, it would appear to be a step in the right direction. 
Except when you use it, you find that Braille is not readable on the display 
until you either press the space bar, or dots 4-5-cord. Why Apple believes this 
is acceptable, I have no idea. Can you imagine a sighted person finding it 
acceptable in any other scenario other than password entry, to not be able to 
look at what they’re entering until they press “Space”?

But it’s worse than that. If you backspace over what you’ve typed, you run into 
back-translation issues similar to those experienced when automatic translation 
is set to on.

Additionally, having to press dots 4-5-cord after inserting a letter in the 
middle of a word is counterintuitive, and again, an implementation far more 
primitive than anything else that offers contracted input. Apple seems to have 
implemented a pretty crude buffer, that is simply dumped when you type one of 
two commands to empty it. That is not a solution.

The Braille implementation in iOS does not meet the “it’s intuitive and it just 
works” test that has been the hallmark of Apple products including VoiceOver.

Now if it were just about us as Braille reading adults, I wouldn’t bother 
writing this post. It would get on my nerves, but I’d continue to work around 
it and just put it down to a bizarre, less than optimal implementation. I’m not 
writing this for me. I’m not asking blind people, and the world’s consumer 
organisations, to come together on this for me or people like me. I’m writing 
this for the kids. It’s the kids who matter.

If you’re a Braille user, you’ll have seen the implementation of Nemeth in iOS 
7. It’s there because Apple’s going after the education market, particularly in 
the US. Good for Apple. I can see enormous benefit in a kid being given an iPad 
and a Braille display for use at home and in school. Don’t underestimate how 
mainstream tech can be a great way to help blind kids blend in with sighted 
kids. Parents feel more empowered, because the iPad is technology they know and 
understand, so when the child gets in trouble at home, they can help out. 
Classroom teachers in mainstream schools know what an iPad is as well and feel 
similarly empowered.

But all of these benefits have to be secondary considerations to the one that 
matters above all else, – equipping our kids with good Braille literacy skills. 
Braille is their ticket to higher education. Braille offers a greater chance of 
gainful employment. Braille is absolutely critical, and Braille is not to be 
trifled with. Half-baked Braille solutions are not appropriate for our kids 
when there’s a crisis in getting Braille instruction to them already.

We should not expect our kids to have to learn to work-around Apple’s poor 
implementation, we should expect Apple to fix its Braille.

For the last 20 years or so, blind kids have increasingly used proprietary 
notetaker technology. I’ve no problem whatsoever with technology moving on, and 
a category of product becoming obsolete. I love the idea of investing in a good 
Braille display that will last you for years, and upgrading the technology that 
drives the display on a more regular basis. But that technology has to do the 
Braille properly.

There are cost savings to be made by cash-strapped agencies who purchase 
equipment for blind children, and that’s also why I’m writing this post. I can 
see bean-counters concluding that the combination of an iPad and a Braille 
display is a good solution for kids now. Many of these purchasers are not 
Braille users themselves, and I believe we have a duty of care to our kids to 
spread the word that Apple is not there yet. It is trying, and should be 
applauded for doing so, but still, it’s not there.

You will remember the huge backlash caused by the initial release of Apple Maps 
in iOS 6. In terms of fitness for purpose, Apple Maps was far superior at 
release than Braille is now. The only difference is that Braille affects a tiny 
fraction of Apple’s user-base, not hundreds of millions of people.

Lest anyone think I’m whining without a solution, I actually know a lot about 
this subject, having worked as a product manager with a range of products that 
use contracted Braille. I have a good feel for where Apple has got it wrong and 
what it might do to fix it, while not of course being familiar with the 
VoiceOver code. But I am absolutely confident that it’s fixable. Let’s not 
forget, Apple invented a way for blind people to make effective use of touch 
screens. Apple gave us unimagined access to taking photos. It is certainly not 
beyond Apple to look at best practice and figure this one out, because unlike 
some of the other things it’s done, the solutions already exist.

If this poor-quality support had been offered to us by an assistive technology 
company, we’d have jumped all over it long before now. But given that Apple 
develops screen readers, that makes it both a mainstream technology company, 
and an assistive technology company. We should hold it to no less a standard.

Having outlined the problem, here’s what I think needs to happen.

Typically, I’d suggest that Apple needs to engage with the community with a 
view to fixing these issues for the sake of our kids, but that’s not really 
been its style. It is secretive by nature. In that case then, it needs to buy 
the expertise to make Braille truly viable in the education market.

As Braille readers, we need to politely articulate the problems to Apple, and 
let Apple know we consider it important that they are fixed.

Consumer organisations should do what they’ve done so many times before, and 
focus on their unity when it comes to Braille issues. A broad-coalition of 
consumers, educators and parents needs to ensure this issue is not allowed to 
drop.

And finally, no one in charge of any purse strings should consider it an 
appropriate solution to give a kid an iPad in the classroom if they’re a 
Braille user. If purchasers want to move away from the blindness notetaker, and 
I get that, a laptop and Braille display is a far better solution in terms of 
Braille reliability and consistency.

I’ll be the first to cheer loudly, and sing Apple’s praises, if it fixes its 
Braille. And I’ll continue to praise all it has done right, which I often do in 
media interviews and blindness tech forums. But please, for the sake of the 
kids, lets do what we need to do to advocate for good quality Braille on Apple 
devices. We have a duty to the next generation to do no less.

I’ve done what I can as an individual to make Apple aware of these failings, 
but clearly, we need to do more to help it gain an appreciation of why this is 
so important.

 

Jonathan Mosen

Mosen Consulting

Blindness technology eBooks, tutorials and training

 <http://mosen.org/> http://Mosen.org

 

On 20/06/2015, at 9:24 am, Joe < <mailto:jsoro...@gmail.com> 
jsoro...@gmail.com> wrote:

 

Hi, I'm curious to hear from people who have replaced their Braille
notetaker with an iDevice. I've been toying with the idea of investing in a
U2 for reading books, taking notes and performing similar quick tasks.

Questions:

1. I've heard there are displays that let you type text and then send to the
iDevice in one burst. I don't understand the mechanics of this, but what are
the displays you know that do this?

2. Is Braille input in iOS as dreadful as some people have made it out to
be? I don't mind learning various keystrokes, but I do mind delays in
transmition.

3. Is there a means to read BRF in iOS?

4. What 32-cell display would you personally recommend?

Thanks guys for any help.

Joe

--
Musings of a Work in Progress:
 <http://www.joeorozco.com/> www.JoeOrozco.com/

Twitter: @ScribblingJoe


-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at  <http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/> 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to  <mailto:viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to  <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> 
viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at  <http://groups.google.com/group/viphone> 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout> 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at  <http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/> 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to  <mailto:viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to  <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> 
viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at  <http://groups.google.com/group/viphone> 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout> 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at  <http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/> 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to  <mailto:viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to  <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> 
viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at  <http://groups.google.com/group/viphone> 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout> 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 


--

Have a great day,

Alex Hall

 <mailto:mehg...@icloud.com> mehg...@icloud.com

 

 

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at  <http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/> 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to  <mailto:viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to  <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> 
viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at  <http://groups.google.com/group/viphone> 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout> 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at  <http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/> 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to  <mailto:viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to  <mailto:viphone@googlegroups.com> 
viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at  <http://groups.google.com/group/viphone> 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit  <https://groups.google.com/d/optout> 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the viphone list. All 
new members to the this list are moderated by default. If you have any 
questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a 
member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators 
directly rather than posting on the list itself. The archives for this list can 
be searched at http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/viphone.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to