On 8/9/16 9:25 PM, Nathan Kidd wrote: > In my experience the _init()/_fini() calling sequence is at least system > dependent (I could reproduce things on one Linux distro, not another), > and I don't suppose Linux is that different from Solaris when it comes > to the insanity described here: > https://blogs.oracle.com/rie/entry/init_and_fini_processing_who
Yeah, and I strongly suspect that the faker's C++ global static destructor is called from within the same function that would call whatever C destructor I would implement, which is probably why I opted for the C++ destructor approach to begin with. As far as Solaris dynamic linking, don't get me started ... :| Literally half of the time I spent at Sun was spent chasing down Solaris-specific issues (at the time, we still had to support Solaris 8, so I couldn't even rely on things like mktemp and which and bash being available. I do not miss those days.) One thing I will say is that my assertions regarding shared memory may be out of date, because of the above. Would probably be good to re-test that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________ VirtualGL-Devel mailing list VirtualGL-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-devel
