Ok - here is the data for a Tesla M2070 and M2070Q (Quadro)

There is a big difference between the Quadro and non-Quadro. Looks like the 
read rate is 1/4 for the non-Quadro. These are virtually same hardware, however 
I know that the Quadro has some cache size differences for transferring data 
(so it can't all be blamed on the driver).


-========================== Tesla M2070Q ==========================-

glreadtest

GLreadtest v2.3.2 (Build 20121221)

glreadtest -h for advanced usage.

Rendering to Pbuffer using GLX on display :0.0
FB Config = 0xe5
Drawable size = 701 x 701 pixels
Using 1-byte row alignment

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  LUM  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   1177 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   0.7823 Mpixels/sec (min = 0.7815, max = 0.7832, sdev = 
0.0008359)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.98% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  RED  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   426.7 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   558.5 Mpixels/sec (min = 532.3, max = 565.5, sdev = 2.631)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.99% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  BGRA  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   429.4 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   688.5 Mpixels/sec (min = 605.3, max = 697.0, sdev = 4.143)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.98% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  ABGR  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   429.4 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   684.2 Mpixels/sec (min = 622.1, max = 692.3, sdev = 3.919)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.98% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  BGR  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   426.3 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   559.1 Mpixels/sec (min = 533.0, max = 564.8, sdev = 2.294)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.98% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  RGBA  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   429.5 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   457.8 Mpixels/sec (min = 438.7, max = 462.3, sdev = 1.327)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.98% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  RGB  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   361.3 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   402.9 Mpixels/sec (min = 393.4, max = 404.8, sdev = 0.8224)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.99% of total readback time



-========================== Tesla M2070 ==========================-

[paulmc@m1028 paulmc]$ glreadtest

GLreadtest v2.3.2 (Build 20121221)

glreadtest -h for advanced usage.

Rendering to Pbuffer using GLX on display :0.0
FB Config = 0xc5
Drawable size = 701 x 701 pixels
Using 1-byte row alignment

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  LUM  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   1147 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   0.7814 Mpixels/sec (min = 0.7806, max = 0.7822, sdev = 
0.0008251)
glReadPixels() accounted for 99.99% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  RED  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   425.1 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   141.3 Mpixels/sec (min = 139.8, max = 141.9, sdev = 0.3018)
glReadPixels() accounted for 100.00% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  BGRA  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   427.7 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   174.4 Mpixels/sec (min = 169.7, max = 175.2, sdev = 0.3794)
glReadPixels() accounted for 100.00% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  ABGR  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   427.7 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   173.9 Mpixels/sec (min = 169.7, max = 174.7, sdev = 0.3563)
glReadPixels() accounted for 100.00% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  BGR  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   424.6 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   142.0 Mpixels/sec (min = 140.6, max = 142.5, sdev = 0.2527)
glReadPixels() accounted for 100.00% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  RGBA  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   427.7 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   116.1 Mpixels/sec (min = 115.2, max = 116.4, sdev = 0.1481)
glReadPixels() accounted for 100.00% of total readback time

>>>>>>>>>>  PIXEL FORMAT:  RGB  <<<<<<<<<<
glDrawPixels():   356.4 Mpixels/sec
glReadPixels():   101.9 Mpixels/sec (min = 101.3, max = 102.1, sdev = 0.08861)
glReadPixels() accounted for 100.00% of total readback time


Cheers,

Paul

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vadim Peretokin" <vpereto...@gmail.com>
> To: "VirtualGL Users" <virtualgl-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: Sunday, 16 June, 2013 2:19:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [VirtualGL-Users] Improving performance on very large displays
> 
> 
> 
> Here is the data for a GTX 560 (not Ti), 310.14 drivers, Ubuntu 12.04
> 64bit: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=xW8v7UpF
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
> 
> Build for Windows Store.
> 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> VirtualGL-Users mailing list
> VirtualGL-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users
> 

-- 
Dr Paul McIntosh
  Senior HPC Consultant, Technical Lead,
    Multi-modal Australian ScienceS Imaging and Visualisation Environment 
(www.massive.org.au)
       Monash University, Ph: 9902 0439 Mob: 0434 524935

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
VirtualGL-Users mailing list
VirtualGL-Users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtualgl-users

Reply via email to